New WIP
Comments
-
I know a lot of people here are liking the two-story, more quirky “g,” but if it means anything I am not particularly fond of it. For me personally, it almost feels backwards as if it is sitting between being a standard “g” and wanting to be a two story “g.”Have you considered a Hobo-like approach (albeit still descending)? This would also allow that tight pinch at the joint which is rather prominent throughout your lowercase.
Just an idea! Fun stuff so far though.
0 -
That's quite nice. I think I'll work it up and include it as a third g style set
I have done that style in an as-yet unreleased family:
0 -
Was thinking you could also add a tight pinch in the existing /g, perhaps here
1 -
I agree with @Craig Eliason and I feel like that ear could also be a bit tighter where it joins the bowl.0
-
For me (as a spanish speaker) the inverted tail direction that Matthew suggested, makes me see it as /q instead of a /g1
-
Craig; I have taken the g in a bit in the middle. Your idea is a bit too extreme.
Original on the left, amended preferred in the middle and too extreme right.2 -
Standard g plus earless g for diacritics. I think this is OK.5
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 482 Type Design Critiques
- 560 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 649 Type Business
- 844 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 517 Typography
- 119 Type Education
- 321 Type History
- 77 Type Resources
- 110 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 31 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 544 Announcements
- 88 Events
- 112 Job Postings
- 170 Type Releases
- 173 Miscellaneous News
- 275 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 120 Suggestions and Bug Reports