New WIP

Matthew Smith

I know a lot of people here are liking the two-story, more quirky “g,” but if it means anything I am not particularly fond of it. For me personally, it almost feels backwards as if it is sitting between being a standard “g” and wanting to be a two story “g.”

Have you considered a Hobo-like approach (albeit still descending)? This would also allow that tight pinch at the joint which is rather prominent throughout your lowercase.

Just an idea! Fun stuff so far though.

Nick Cooke

That's quite nice. I think I'll work it up and include it as a third g style set 

I have done that style in an as-yet unreleased family:

Craig Eliason

Was thinking you could also add a tight pinch in the existing /g, perhaps here

Jasper de Waard

I agree with @Craig Eliason and I feel like that ear could also be a bit tighter where it joins the bowl. 

PabloImpallari

For me (as a spanish speaker) the inverted tail direction that Matthew suggested, makes me see it as /q instead of a /g

Nick Cooke

Craig; I have taken the g in a bit in the middle. Your idea is a bit too extreme. 
Original on the left, amended preferred in the middle and too extreme right.

Nick Cooke

Standard g plus earless g for diacritics. I think this is OK.