New WIP
Comments
- 
            I know a lot of people here are liking the two-story, more quirky “g,” but if it means anything I am not particularly fond of it. For me personally, it almost feels backwards as if it is sitting between being a standard “g” and wanting to be a two story “g.”Have you considered a Hobo-like approach (albeit still descending)? This would also allow that tight pinch at the joint which is rather prominent throughout your lowercase.
Just an idea! Fun stuff so far though.
0 - 
            That's quite nice. I think I'll work it up and include it as a third g style set

I have done that style in an as-yet unreleased family:
0 - 
            Was thinking you could also add a tight pinch in the existing /g, perhaps here

1 - 
            I agree with @Craig Eliason and I feel like that ear could also be a bit tighter where it joins the bowl.0
 - 
            For me (as a spanish speaker) the inverted tail direction that Matthew suggested, makes me see it as /q instead of a /g1
 - 
            Craig; I have taken the g in a bit in the middle. Your idea is a bit too extreme.
Original on the left, amended preferred in the middle and too extreme right.
                        2 - 
            Standard g plus earless g for diacritics. I think this is OK.
                        5 
Categories
- All Categories
 - 46 Introductions
 - 3.9K Typeface Design
 - 485 Type Design Critiques
 - 561 Type Design Software
 - 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
 - 654 Type Business
 - 853 Font Technology
 - 29 Punchcutting
 - 519 Typography
 - 119 Type Education
 - 323 Type History
 - 77 Type Resources
 - 112 Lettering and Calligraphy
 - 33 Lettering Critiques
 - 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
 - 550 Announcements
 - 91 Events
 - 114 Job Postings
 - 170 Type Releases
 - 174 Miscellaneous News
 - 276 About TypeDrawers
 - 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
 - 120 Suggestions and Bug Reports
 




