Best Of
-
Re: ‘Grand Cru Classés’ sprouting from Antwerp soil
Wednesday 23 November Inside/Outside, the Expert class Type design / Expert class Book design 2016 exhibition, will open at Kades-Kaden in Antwerp!6 -
Re: Changes to Reactions
I still miss the Insightful reaction. I always found that distinct from Agree (and more valuable, personally).11 -
Re: Changes to Reactions
So we moderators/administrators have decided to make a small change to this test by adding the agree/disagree reactions. Ideally, agree/disagree would work in the general flow of conversation and up/…10 -
Introducing Typekit Marketplace
Hi everybody. I head up the Type and Typekit teams at Adobe. I wanted to share with you some news. Today, we're launching Typekit Marketplace, which augments the Typekit subscription library with tho…7 -
Re: Changes to Reactions
I think upvoting and downvoting works for stuff like stack exchange, for which one specific solution might be the best answer to someone's issue. I think the threads here are way more open ended than…7 -
Re: How do you implement ijacute and IJacute?
When working on the Brill fonts, this was something that I discussed at some length with Pim Rietbroek at Brill. They favour use of the precomposed digraph characters for IJ/ij, and I believe they may …5 -
Re: Changes to Reactions
Downvoted! :# One problem I have with this is I think downvoting for abuse/off-topic etc. is different than downvoting for disagreement. For one thing, if a productive back-and-forth is happening wit…7 -
Re: Changes to Reactions
I like the previous system to express opinion. Othrerwise I would need to post myself and that would clutter up the thread.11 -
Re: Changes to Reactions
I don't know if I miss the old system in full but I would like to disagree with someone's arguments without voting to bury the post at the same time. I think the Agree / Disagree button is necessary.7 -
Re: Changes to Reactions
I'm already missing the old system.9
