On the appropriateness of small-cap-specific symbols
mauro sacchetto
Posts: 395
Some fonts (such as EB Garamond) include additional punctuation (question marks, exclamation marks, etc.) and other characters (parentheses, braces, guillemets, etc.) designed specifically for small caps; these appear smaller to match the height of the small caps themselves:

In reality, most fonts (e.g., Garamond Premiere, Brill) do not make this distinction, partly because these symbols are intended to serve both uppercase and lowercase text.
What is your take on this? Is it advisable to have specific versions of certain symbols—such as exclamation and question marks—for use with small caps to ensure visual consistency within the text, while perhaps omitting such specific versions for other symbols?
Thank you
Tagged:
0
Answers
-
I would consider including smallcap exclamation mark and question mark, for potential use in running headers, which are often set in smallcaps. If parenthetical or quotation marks, including guillemets, occur in such a situation, adjusting the height of the default glyphs is usually adequate.1
-
One detail: if I scale down the question mark and exclamation mark, the dot in both glyphs will also be scaled down proportionally. Should the period and comma - whose "head" is generally identical but slightly larger - also be adjusted, or should they be left as they are (i.e., as they appear in "normal," non-small-cap text)? If I don't adjust them, a noticeable size difference might arise, especially if two short sentences follow one another, one ending with a question or exclamation mark and the second with a period. Or am I overthinking this?PS Actually, I’ve already planned to position the *quoteright* (the apostrophe, which appears very frequently in Italian) lower down, aligned with the top of the small caps.
0 -
I would adjust the size of the dot in the smallcap exclamation and question mark to the weight of the smallcaps, not to their size. So I would begin with that adjustment, which means making the dot slightly smaller than the default one, and then adjust the size of the shape above it vertically as necessary to ensure a reasonable gap between it and the dot.0
-
Another thing to consider is that it might be useful to have full size punctuation retained for small-caps settings and downsized punctuation for "caps-to-small-caps" settings.In the former, caps are big and something like (Cʀᴀɪɢ) probably demands a tall open parenthesis before the capital C. But with c2sc any glyphs that depart from the consistent small-caps height really jump out.
1 -
Oh, I would definitely only map smallcap punctuation in the c2sc feature, and not in the smcp feature. They are only appropriate in all-smallcaps setting.2
-
I’ve tried to fine-tune some details in Garamontio (a fork of EB Garamond that I use for testing) regarding smcp and c2sc. Fractions can be generated even when smcp and c2sc are applied.
1 -
If find the height overshoot of the smallcap ! and ? distracting. I think one should aim for these to have the same vertical relationship to the smallcaps as the full size versions have to the caps, so they don’t stand out.4
-
FWIW, my standard set for all-small-caps punctuation is ! ¡ ? ¿ ( ) [ ] { } ' " ’ ” / \ &Implemented only in {c2sc} as Craig and John advocated above.Coincidentally, I started including the quote marks after a request from an Italian publisher with their desire to have better-behaved apostrophe and not have to manage manually throughout.As it happens, that was still in the Postscript days, so I made up a special SC font for them with these lowered quotes. OpenType makes it easier to have it both ways for U&SC vs. all-SC.3
-
@John Hudson Thanks for pointing that out. Those characters (!?) in the small caps set are still the original ones from EB Garamond. I will try to adjust their size relative to the other letters.Edit: Experiment
0 -
I totally agree with the need of providing single quotes and guillemets aligned for c2sc feature. In Catalan the situation is the same as in Italian. Words with articles would be, for instance: “l’ham”, “d’or”.
0 -
I'm a little late jumping into this one, but here are some thoughts from the perspective of a book typographer and academic typesetter:
I generally dislike small-cap-specific punctuation because it feels too contemporary for my taste. Older books used normal punctuation with small caps.
I find the fit of small caps against full-height delimiters aesthetically pleasing, especially if — as is my preference — the delimiters span the full lc ascender/descender height. For instance, set some small-cap text within full-height brackets, and the spurs on the brackets imply a pleasing frame around the text. This effect is lost when the delimiters are shortened.
In running text, I always use full-height !? with small caps. I make an exception for small-caps headings and other displayed text, where I will use the shorter variants, if available.
I like normal quotation marks and apostrophes in small-cap text. The lowered versions look wrong to me.
This is a combination of aesthetic preference and historical tradition. I find the mix of small caps and regular punctuation, as in early- to mid-twentieth-century books, pleasing and evocative. "Small-cap" punctuation is to me analogous to "italicized" delimiters — a late-twentieth-century or early-twenty-first-century invention, not part of the tradition of typography, and therefore incongruous.
7 -
mauro sacchetto said:the apostrophe, which appears very frequently in Italian
Of course both these assertions are correct; but I point out that the apostropheʼs use is also common in the very language weʼre all writing in…!pereelmagne said:In Catalan the situation is the same as in Italian.1 -
One more thought: personally, I have no use for small-cap-sized numerals. I use normal oldstyle numerals with small caps, as has been done for five hundred years. Presumably someone wants them, since they seem to be getting more common in text faces. But I find them to be a nuisance, especially if they are automatically activated by the "all-small-caps" attribute. For instance, in Lyon, which I have been using extensively for years, I need to use GREP styles to override this behavior and impose OS figures on SC text. I will shortly be working with my web developer to do the same in our CSS code.3
-
It is possible for a font developer to establish small-caps figures to deploy with All Small Caps and yet be easily overrideable by OsF. I think you can basically have it all.*In the Haffner Text fonts that I recently released, the default figures in the font are lining figures. There are oldstyle figures enabled by the {onum} feature. And I chose to make small-caps figures as well (though I’m not convinced that I’ll make this a regular inclusion with my text fonts).Here is how the figures are deployed relative to the small caps features:If no specific OpenType figure style is specified, then text that is set to Small Caps — i.e., U&SC setting — will have oldstyle figures deployed to accompany the small caps. And if the text is set to All Small Caps, then the small-caps figures will deploy, because the user has not made an explicit figure designation.If, however, the user has turned on Oldstyle Figures {onum} explicitly, then this is respected even when All Small Caps is applied.Conversely, if the user has explicitly specified Lining Figures {lnum}, then the Small Caps setting will respect that. (Don’t ask me when you would want this, but the typographer can readily achieve it without needing to apply features too selectively.) All Small Caps will still deploy the small-cap figures, since this seems to me the logical equivalent in this context.
* Okay, so the one combination you cannot readily achieve without selectively turning off a feature for the figures alone is All Small Caps with full-height Lining Figures. (Sorry, I have no sympathies for this use case.)
6 -
Thanks for this, Kent. This seems like a sensible way to program things — perhaps, dare I say, more sensible than the approaches taken in various other commercial text faces I've encountered.
Also, congratulations on your latest release and the launch of your website, which I've just been browsing. I don't have a source for the Walton quotation, but it is reminiscent of a line of Oscar Wilde's; see below:
https://www.oscarwilde.us/quotations/america/took-out-a-comma.html1 -
Joshua — Thanks for the Wilde quote. Yes, it has a similar sense to it, doesn’t it? Well noted.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 47 Introductions
- 4K Typeface Design
- 505 Type Design Critiques
- 596 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 677 Type Business
- 911 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 544 Typography
- 129 Type Education
- 333 Type History
- 82 Type Resources
- 114 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 33 Lettering Critiques
- 81 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 587 Announcements
- 101 Events
- 118 Job Postings
- 179 Type Releases
- 188 Miscellaneous News
- 270 About TypeDrawers
- 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 114 Suggestions and Bug Reports





