Evolution of the Alphabet chart
Anyone else see this recently?
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2019/01/evolution-of-the-alphabet/
Just curious, as it is presented as a condensed overview of how Latin letters developed over centuries. I can't attest to how valid or invalid it may be, but thought it was interesting nonetheless and something others may have more insight on.
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2019/01/evolution-of-the-alphabet/
Just curious, as it is presented as a condensed overview of how Latin letters developed over centuries. I can't attest to how valid or invalid it may be, but thought it was interesting nonetheless and something others may have more insight on.
0
Comments
-
I’m not sure about the glyph for the Greek Digamma (F-row) shown. The omission of the Greek Sampi and the Omega seems a bit odd. Apart from that, it’s actually a rather nice work.
0 -
Yes, I've seen it passed around a couple times. Most glaringly, Ancient Greek and Ancient Latin are presented backwards. So most lay comments on this image are along the lines of "why did the Romans mirror the whole thing." The Greeks used boustrophedon writing, which is probably how the forms got turned around, but even then these were not considered the forward forms, and I don't think Latin was found this way at all.
1 -
It's not perfect, but I still bought a four-pack of those posters (it makes a nice gift).0
Categories
- All Categories
- 47 Introductions
- 4K Typeface Design
- 496 Type Design Critiques
- 587 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 674 Type Business
- 897 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 542 Typography
- 127 Type Education
- 333 Type History
- 82 Type Resources
- 114 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 33 Lettering Critiques
- 81 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 571 Announcements
- 100 Events
- 116 Job Postings
- 171 Type Releases
- 183 Miscellaneous News
- 270 About TypeDrawers
- 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 114 Suggestions and Bug Reports



