Evolution of the Alphabet chart

Adam Ladd
Posts: 280
Anyone else see this recently?
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2019/01/evolution-of-the-alphabet/
Just curious, as it is presented as a condensed overview of how Latin letters developed over centuries. I can't attest to how valid or invalid it may be, but thought it was interesting nonetheless and something others may have more insight on.
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2019/01/evolution-of-the-alphabet/
Just curious, as it is presented as a condensed overview of how Latin letters developed over centuries. I can't attest to how valid or invalid it may be, but thought it was interesting nonetheless and something others may have more insight on.
0
Comments
-
I’m not sure about the glyph for the Greek Digamma (F-row) shown. The omission of the Greek Sampi and the Omega seems a bit odd. Apart from that, it’s actually a rather nice work.
0 -
Yes, I've seen it passed around a couple times. Most glaringly, Ancient Greek and Ancient Latin are presented backwards. So most lay comments on this image are along the lines of "why did the Romans mirror the whole thing." The Greeks used boustrophedon writing, which is probably how the forms got turned around, but even then these were not considered the forward forms, and I don't think Latin was found this way at all.
1 -
It's not perfect, but I still bought a four-pack of those posters (it makes a nice gift).0
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 480 Type Design Critiques
- 558 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 647 Type Business
- 838 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 513 Typography
- 119 Type Education
- 319 Type History
- 75 Type Resources
- 110 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 31 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 540 Announcements
- 88 Events
- 112 Job Postings
- 168 Type Releases
- 171 Miscellaneous News
- 275 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 120 Suggestions and Bug Reports