Evolution of the Alphabet chart

Adam Ladd
Posts: 264
Anyone else see this recently?
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2019/01/evolution-of-the-alphabet/
Just curious, as it is presented as a condensed overview of how Latin letters developed over centuries. I can't attest to how valid or invalid it may be, but thought it was interesting nonetheless and something others may have more insight on.
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2019/01/evolution-of-the-alphabet/
Just curious, as it is presented as a condensed overview of how Latin letters developed over centuries. I can't attest to how valid or invalid it may be, but thought it was interesting nonetheless and something others may have more insight on.
0
Comments
-
I’m not sure about the glyph for the Greek Digamma (F-row) shown. The omission of the Greek Sampi and the Omega seems a bit odd. Apart from that, it’s actually a rather nice work.
0 -
Yes, I've seen it passed around a couple times. Most glaringly, Ancient Greek and Ancient Latin are presented backwards. So most lay comments on this image are along the lines of "why did the Romans mirror the whole thing." The Greeks used boustrophedon writing, which is probably how the forms got turned around, but even then these were not considered the forward forms, and I don't think Latin was found this way at all.
1 -
It's not perfect, but I still bought a four-pack of those posters (it makes a nice gift).0
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 815 Font Technology
- 1.1K Technique and Theory
- 630 Type Business
- 450 Type Design Critiques
- 548 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 138 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 85 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 497 Typography
- 307 History of Typography
- 116 Education
- 74 Resources
- 511 Announcements
- 82 Events
- 107 Job Postings
- 154 Type Releases
- 167 Miscellaneous News
- 271 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 117 Suggestions and Bug Reports