Evolution of the Alphabet chart

Adam Ladd
Posts: 273
Anyone else see this recently?
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2019/01/evolution-of-the-alphabet/
Just curious, as it is presented as a condensed overview of how Latin letters developed over centuries. I can't attest to how valid or invalid it may be, but thought it was interesting nonetheless and something others may have more insight on.
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2019/01/evolution-of-the-alphabet/
Just curious, as it is presented as a condensed overview of how Latin letters developed over centuries. I can't attest to how valid or invalid it may be, but thought it was interesting nonetheless and something others may have more insight on.
0
Comments
-
I’m not sure about the glyph for the Greek Digamma (F-row) shown. The omission of the Greek Sampi and the Omega seems a bit odd. Apart from that, it’s actually a rather nice work.
0 -
Yes, I've seen it passed around a couple times. Most glaringly, Ancient Greek and Ancient Latin are presented backwards. So most lay comments on this image are along the lines of "why did the Romans mirror the whole thing." The Greeks used boustrophedon writing, which is probably how the forms got turned around, but even then these were not considered the forward forms, and I don't think Latin was found this way at all.
1 -
It's not perfect, but I still bought a four-pack of those posters (it makes a nice gift).0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44 Introductions
- 3.8K Typeface Design
- 474 Type Design Critiques
- 554 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 637 Type Business
- 826 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 505 Typography
- 120 Type Education
- 312 Type History
- 73 Type Resources
- 109 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 30 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 528 Announcements
- 84 Events
- 110 Job Postings
- 164 Type Releases
- 169 Miscellaneous News
- 273 About TypeDrawers
- 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 117 Suggestions and Bug Reports