Are typefaces for writing different from typefaces for reading?
jaimes
Posts: 27
I've played around with different typefaces for my websites, and I keep coming to a divide between reading and writing.
For writing I find I need generous letter-spacing. For reading, the repetitive pattern of the wide spacing becomes a distraction, and I prefer more compact fonts.
I see that the Terza family capitalizes on this idea, with sub-typefaces Terza Reader, Terza Author, Terza Editor.
The Author and Editor are quasi-monospaced and monospaced respectively.
For my own writing in prose, I find monospaced fonts too rough, but the fonts I like for reading (e.g. Sanomat Sans Text) are uncomfortably compact for writing. I end up preferring wide-stance fonts like Zed Text or Verdana.
For coding, I think that monospaced fonts are just too convenient to eschew, and somehow they don't bother me for code as they do for prose.
Are the debates about readability settled?
Are there proportional typefaces designed specifically for writing?
And, if a typeface is knowingly optimized for writing instead of for reading (therefore publishing), isn't that going to shrink its market?
And, if a typeface is knowingly optimized for writing instead of for reading (therefore publishing), isn't that going to shrink its market?
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 47 Introductions
- 4K Typeface Design
- 496 Type Design Critiques
- 583 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 674 Type Business
- 891 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 541 Typography
- 126 Type Education
- 333 Type History
- 82 Type Resources
- 113 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 33 Lettering Critiques
- 80 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 570 Announcements
- 100 Events
- 116 Job Postings
- 170 Type Releases
- 183 Miscellaneous News
- 270 About TypeDrawers
- 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 114 Suggestions and Bug Reports