Rounded Cyrillic M
Adam Jagosz
Posts: 689
I've been wondering whether this design, three vertical stems with rounded apices, would be good for the Cyrillic capital and small letters Em (М м). Latin Mm followed by Cyrillic in all samples.
The above examples don't look too refined, but otherwise, apart from adding another set of verticals to a script overwhelmed by them, is there a legibility issue? Can this shape be mistaken for Cyrillic Te (Т т)?
I guess this is an example of such failure:
Note how Zoo 300 tries to mitigate the possible confusion by nudging the apices outwards.
Some, if not most, of these typefaces avoid the issue altogether, for the price of style.
About these I'm not certain.
For Blackletter, this seems to be the only option either way.
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
It is preferable to use the shape with the acute angles for both uppercase and lowercase. If the lc м has to be like the one in Bauhaus (two Roman arches), add a stroke above the т to differentiate them.
3 -
Love that Carol Gothic sample!Vasil: The м is one of the two glyphs in that sample that strike me as breaking the unwritten rules of blackletter (with у being the other one).
2 -
Even with the rounded top, I'd worry that the three-legged М may be mistaken for Т.1
-
Adam Jagosz said:Can this shape be mistaken for Cyrillic Te (Т т)?
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 40 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 795 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 610 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 538 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 135 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 82 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 479 Typography
- 300 History of Typography
- 113 Education
- 66 Resources
- 495 Announcements
- 79 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 162 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports