Need name suggestion for the axis controlling apex in variable font
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46827/46827d82c796f99d7767d193ef9196fca07dd1fa" alt="Ariq Syauqi"
Ariq Syauqi
Posts: 13
Hello TypeDrawers!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31eac/31eac3f9843ce0726d3097a03ad0d17fa197f816" alt="Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5019405/uploads/editor/93/0n9lazkm98td.png"
What's the best name for this axis? Is "Middle apex height" right?
This is my first topic here, hopefully I'm doing it right.
Currently I am playing with variable font format and want to add an axis controlling the middle apex especially on M and W.
I try to create something like this:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31eac/31eac3f9843ce0726d3097a03ad0d17fa197f816" alt="Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5019405/uploads/editor/93/0n9lazkm98td.png"
What's the best name for this axis? Is "Middle apex height" right?
Any suggestion will help.
Thank you!
Thank you!
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
Crotch?2
-
An “apex” is at the top, like the join at the top of /A or perhaps the one in the middle of /W. “Crotch” is the opposite, the center join in the /M, but because of its particular anatomical meaning, is arguably not an ideal word to use in an interface. Also, if the middle part of the /W is also adjusted downwards, it is no longer an apex, yet still arguably not a crotch.
“Vertex" is an appropriate word that would apply to the center junction in both /M and /W.
0 -
waistline?0
-
Depth? Cleavage?
0 -
Chris Lozos said:waistline?
To me, that means primarily the height of the traditionally mid-height things, such as the crossbar on H, centre bar of E, and possibly the middle bits of P, R, G, F as well.
0 -
I was thinking the middle bits of the M and W where all hell breaks loose ;-)
0 -
Center joint/break?0
-
Since it seems to be only relevant to M and W, there is more clarity in mentioning them than in any other words you choose. So call it "M-W Center Depth" or similar.I do believe "depth" is more descriptive than "height" here because it's a matter of how far the angle plunges into the letterform, in either direction. "Height" implies distance above the baseline, and I assume that you aren't making it so that setting a "low" center is deep for M and shallow for W.3
-
While the term cleavage seems good🙂🙂🙂, I think vertex depth describes it well!K Pease said:Since it seems to be only relevant to M and W, there is more clarity in mentioning them than in any other words you choose. So call it "M-W Center Depth" or similar.I do believe "depth" is more descriptive than "height" here because it's a matter of how far the angle plunges into the letterform, in either direction. "Height" implies distance above the baseline, and I assume that you aren't making it so that setting a "low" center is deep for M and shallow for W.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 811 Font Technology
- 1.1K Technique and Theory
- 628 Type Business
- 449 Type Design Critiques
- 547 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 137 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 84 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 493 Typography
- 307 History of Typography
- 115 Education
- 71 Resources
- 505 Announcements
- 81 Events
- 106 Job Postings
- 151 Type Releases
- 166 Miscellaneous News
- 271 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 117 Suggestions and Bug Reports