Eating into your own market with similar releases?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10814/108141c203d855ef00d0e8dcbb2285765d6fb56b" alt="Adam Ladd"
Adam Ladd
Posts: 264
Have you ever seen a negative impact from releasing two related, but arguably different enough, versions of a font into the market within a short time of each other (e.g. 2-3 weeks)? Do they eat into each other's effectiveness/sales potential and should have some time on their own, or might they benefit each other by showing breadth and giving exposure to the other?
For example, it might be Fontname was the original release, and 2-3 weeks later a companion, Fontname Stencil or Fontname Rounded, is ready.
For example, it might be Fontname was the original release, and 2-3 weeks later a companion, Fontname Stencil or Fontname Rounded, is ready.
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
People often want related fonts if they see them presented within a short time so it is likely thay releasing Fontname then Fontname Stencil and Fontname Rounded shortly after will enhance sales.If the original font was any good of course !2
-
Ha, yes, valid point at the end, Paul. Thanks.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 811 Font Technology
- 1.1K Technique and Theory
- 628 Type Business
- 449 Type Design Critiques
- 547 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 137 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 84 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 493 Typography
- 307 History of Typography
- 115 Education
- 71 Resources
- 505 Announcements
- 81 Events
- 106 Job Postings
- 151 Type Releases
- 166 Miscellaneous News
- 271 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 117 Suggestions and Bug Reports