Thoughts on this lettermark?

Posts: 243
edited February 2016 in Technique and Theory
Any weirdness in this? I'm quite happy with it so far but just wanted to get a second opinion on it.  Thanks!

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Comments

  • /A is very easily confusable with /4.
  • Posts: 243
    edited February 2016
    hey @George Thomas, thanks for the feedback. Yeah I can see how that may be a problem. Not sure how I can fix that unless I split D/A. On a different note, what do you think of the weight/slant, and anything else? Does it look right? I don't think I'll go forward with it as a logo but I might as well use it as an exercise.

  • I thought it looked pretty good except for that one thing.
  • Posts: 331
    edited February 2016
    I read it first as SDA, FWIW. I also agree, it looks pretty good. If you're looking for extreme nitpicks, I would think about the counterspace, in particular the almost-heart-shaped one between S & D... something about it is slightly off. Either my eye wants it to be more symmetrical, or much less symmetrical, if that makes sense. Also curves of the S & D may be too tight, making the whitespace very narrow, if you would be using this as a logo on a business card. 
  • Posts: 243
    edited February 2016
    "George Thomas"  gotcha, thanks! @Dyana Weissman sweet, yeah its a mixed reaction. As soon as george pointed it out I asked a few people and some saw a 4 and some an A. Regarding the spacing for SD at smaller sizes yeah totally. I did create another alternative for smaller versions with generous spacing but I think I'll redo the whole thing or scrap this idea. Thanks!

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.