Best Of
-
Re: Myfonts/monotype New Agreement
@"Marco Pezzotta" I would imagine so.2 -
Re: Any recommendations for a reputable vendor focused on Cyrillic (or generally multi-language) fonts?
TypeToday comes to my mind: https://type.today/en/about Also, FutureFonts prefer typefaces with non-Latin writing systems included.4 -
Re: Any recommendations for a reputable vendor focused on Cyrillic (or generally multi-language) fonts?
Unfortunately, Paratype also has a CEO who spoke out in favor of Russia’s annexation of the occupied territories of Ukraine.11 -
Re: Any recommendations for a reputable vendor focused on Cyrillic (or generally multi-language) fonts?
Hi Igor, thanks a lot! I think TypeToday is likely the one I liked but couldn't remember the name of. I will examine some more and probably be contacting them. However, while I like FutureFonts,…1 -
Re: Myfonts/monotype New Agreement
Apt remark. As I remember from that notice, with an old contract we can still ship the submission to MyFonts, only. But for publication on all subsidiary markets + offline sales + subscription servic…4 -
Re: New logo with custom type: MARKESSA. How did I do?
I am not a professional, but the first A looks closer to the M than the R. I’m not sure why. Maybe the right foot of the A is too big. Maybe the serifs at the top of the M and A just make it look tha…2 -
Re: Monotype acquires Font Bureau IP
This comes as a surprise. I was expecting to see this announcement come from The Type Founders eventually.1 -
Re: Myfonts/monotype New Agreement
From two weeks ago: there is no way to add new font families or update an old ones if the Agreement is not up to date.8 -
Re: Regular vs Book
Because some ancient version of Windows couldn't deal with weightclasses that weren't evenly divisible by 100.1 -
Re: Myfonts/monotype New Agreement
Point 1 is ridiculous. If they want to own everything in our heads like we're a stable of Disney artists, they would have to offer a lot more. And their broken system doesn't even allow for…5
