Home› Technique and Theory
Options

What non-English ligatures are there?

Eimantas PaškonisEimantas Paškonis Posts: 91
in Technique and Theory
Like ïï, fð, fþ etc.
Tagged:
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Nick ShinnNick Shinn Posts: 2,146
    Brasíl might need one in some serif fonts.
  • Options
    James PuckettJames Puckett Posts: 1,970
    fð seems to be a fairly rare combination, although I did not check it against a list of names. It would certainly be a fun ligature.
  • Options
    Ermin MeđedovićErmin Međedović Posts: 74
    ąj (aogonek+j)
  • Options
    Jack JenningsJack Jennings Posts: 151
    Another useful thing to know would be how to solve some of these; do you combine the glyphs, or do you try and separate them? I imagine that /aogonek+/j might be confusing if they were redesigned to collide more gracefully, and you'd probably want to push the ogonek to the left or the j to the right… is that correct?

    fþ probably follows fl, but does fð want to combine, or separate? does ïï combine to three dots, or…?

    There's probably not a right or wrong for some of these, I suppose.

    [off topic:] ïï, fð, fþ all seem like the worst letter combinations to try and pronounce…
  • Options
    Nick ShinnNick Shinn Posts: 2,146
    AFAIK, the sequence ąj does not exist in Polish.
    The sequence ą, is more relevant.
  • Options
    RalfRalf Posts: 170
    So the question is: which letter pairs are problematic in a certain language and might be replaced with a specific ligature oder contextual replacement?

    For German: f + Umlaut (ü/ö/ä)
  • Options
    Nick ShinnNick Shinn Posts: 2,146
    Thanks, I didn’t know that.
  • Options
    Max PhillipsMax Phillips Posts: 474
    I'm not sure a ligature is the best solution though.
    Even a non-connecting ligature?
  • Options
    Craig EliasonCraig Eliason Posts: 1,400
    Even a non-connecting ligature?
    Aren't in most cases contextual alternates a neater solution to non-connecting ligatures?
  • Options
    John HudsonJohn Hudson Posts: 2,977
    It's impossible to talk about ligatures existing independent of typeface style, so unless one has a particular ą and j to consider one can't determine what the most appropriate solution will be.
  • Options
    Thomas PhinneyThomas Phinney Posts: 2,748
    > Aren't in most cases contextual alternates a neater solution to non-connecting ligatures?

    Often, yes. But it depends on the typeface....
  • Options
    Deleted AccountDeleted Account Posts: 739
    IJ?
  • Options
    Max PhillipsMax Phillips Posts: 474
    Does anyone use the German c_k and c_h anymore?
  • Options
    Eimantas PaškonisEimantas Paškonis Posts: 91
    edited April 2013
    @Max: What I have in mind are problematic pairs that need solving, not decorative ones.
  • Options
    Paul van der LaanPaul van der Laan Posts: 242
    Indeed. IJ is not a problematic pair, for instance.
  • Options
    John HudsonJohn Hudson Posts: 2,977
    The German c_h and c_k combinations seem to have entirely fallen out of use in 'antiqua' (roman) typography, where they never looked entirely comfortable anyway. I believe they're still standard for correct blackletter orthography, though.
  • Options
    Christian MunkChristian Munk Posts: 11
    fð is quite a common combination of letters in Icelandic, Faroese and Old Norse. Take the word hefði "had". The ligature doesn't seem to be very common, but it is included in at least this book: http://fontsinuse.com/uses/3849/avisaga-biography

    And in the font Inknut Antiqua: http://clauseggers.github.io/

    Of course I can see that this discussion took place a couple of years ago, so I don't blame anyone for not knowing about these cases. I'm just bringing this topic up to date, because I recently fell over the letter combination, and thought it needed a ligature.
  • Options
    Christian ThalmannChristian Thalmann Posts: 1,941
    Got all of those covered. :blush:Though admittedly ïï collides in Bold. Who uses that, anyway?

    BTW, if you want to support High Valyrian, check whether Qy and Qȳ collide.  :wink: 
  • Options
    Christian MunkChristian Munk Posts: 11
    Another overlooked ligature is the rz-ligature. Not that it is absolutely nescessary, but it can be so elegant when done well. I know I've seen one, but I can't find any pictures of it at the moment. And I guess it's primarily Polish that benefits from such a ligature.
  • Options
    Christian ThalmannChristian Thalmann Posts: 1,941
    Oh, that reminds me... I do have those in one of my previous fonts. :blush: 
  • Options
    jakob_rungejakob_runge Posts: 18
    edited September 2015
    Maybe this is a helpful source: http://www.urtd.net/x/cod/
  • Options
    Michał JarocińskiMichał Jarociński Posts: 10
    Christian Munk said:
    Another overlooked ligature is the rz-ligature. Not that it is absolutely nescessary, but it can be so elegant when done well. I know I've seen one, but I can't find any pictures of it at the moment. And I guess it's primarily Polish that benefits from such a ligature.
    I wouldn't strive for this. In Poland we don't use ligatures in everyday life. Maybe on some display fancy typefaces...  Beside r_z ligature there could be also c_z and s_z. 
  • Options
    Michael RafailykMichael Rafailyk Posts: 141
    edited November 2021
    Jack Jennings said:
    ïï, fð, fþ all seem like the worst letter combinations to try and pronounce…
    її in Ukrainian is a real word that means her and sounds quite melodic :)
  • Options
    Paul HanslowPaul Hanslow Posts: 160
    edited November 2021
    The double /lslash/ can also occur in Polish buts it's extremely rare, such as surnames like Kołłątaj and Jagiełło. I haven't seen any examples of this occurring in printed texts but handwritten examples could possibly have a single wavy styled slash located at the top of both /l/ ascenders. relevant TD link
  • Options
    Helmut WollmersdorferHelmut Wollmersdorfer Posts: 212
    John Hudson said:
    The German c_h and c_k combinations seem to have entirely fallen out of use in 'antiqua' (roman) typography, where they never looked entirely comfortable anyway. I believe they're still standard for correct blackletter orthography, though.
    If someone likes to use Fraktur, he should stick to the old traditions. IMHO Fraktur is hard to read fast. But it has some place in advertisements, beer labels and signs of pubs.

    Unifraktur Maguntia  http://unifraktur.sourceforge.net/ supports:



    Some fonts also have longs_c_h, longs_s, longs_longs_k, longs_longs_t, t_t.
  • Options
    Igor FreibergerIgor Freiberger Posts: 253
    This is the repertoire of ligatures I'm using in my font projects:


  • Options
    John HudsonJohn Hudson Posts: 2,977
    Igor, you could handle that set with a much smaller number of contextual ligating glyphs.
  • Options
    Peter ConstablePeter Constable Posts: 199
    John Hudson said:
    Igor, you could handle that set with a much smaller number of contextual ligating glyphs.
    Could you elaborate?
Sign In or Register to comment.