What non-English ligatures are there?
Eimantas Paškonis
Posts: 91
Comments
-
Brasíl might need one in some serif fonts.
1 -
fð seems to be a fairly rare combination, although I did not check it against a list of names. It would certainly be a fun ligature.0
-
ąj (aogonek+j)0
-
Another useful thing to know would be how to solve some of these; do you combine the glyphs, or do you try and separate them? I imagine that /aogonek+/j might be confusing if they were redesigned to collide more gracefully, and you'd probably want to push the ogonek to the left or the j to the right… is that correct?
fþ probably follows fl, but does fð want to combine, or separate? does ïï combine to three dots, or…?
There's probably not a right or wrong for some of these, I suppose.
[off topic:] ïï, fð, fþ all seem like the worst letter combinations to try and pronounce…1 -
AFAIK, the sequence ąj does not exist in Polish.
The sequence ą, is more relevant.1 -
So the question is: which letter pairs are problematic in a certain language and might be replaced with a specific ligature oder contextual replacement?
For German: f + Umlaut (ü/ö/ä)1 -
@Nick: ąj is quite common in Lithuanian. In sentences that use "the X one": "Something something the white one"; "Blah the new one blah" etc.6
-
Thanks, I didn’t know that.
0 -
I'm not sure a ligature is the best solution though.
Even a non-connecting ligature?1 -
Even a non-connecting ligature?
Aren't in most cases contextual alternates a neater solution to non-connecting ligatures?0 -
It's impossible to talk about ligatures existing independent of typeface style, so unless one has a particular ą and j to consider one can't determine what the most appropriate solution will be.2
-
> Aren't in most cases contextual alternates a neater solution to non-connecting ligatures?
Often, yes. But it depends on the typeface....0 -
IJ?2
-
Does anyone use the German c_k and c_h anymore?1
-
@Max: What I have in mind are problematic pairs that need solving, not decorative ones.1
-
Indeed. IJ is not a problematic pair, for instance.0
-
The German c_h and c_k combinations seem to have entirely fallen out of use in 'antiqua' (roman) typography, where they never looked entirely comfortable anyway. I believe they're still standard for correct blackletter orthography, though.1
-
fð is quite a common combination of letters in Icelandic, Faroese and Old Norse. Take the word hefði "had". The ligature doesn't seem to be very common, but it is included in at least this book: http://fontsinuse.com/uses/3849/avisaga-biography
And in the font Inknut Antiqua: http://clauseggers.github.io/
Of course I can see that this discussion took place a couple of years ago, so I don't blame anyone for not knowing about these cases. I'm just bringing this topic up to date, because I recently fell over the letter combination, and thought it needed a ligature.
3 -
Got all of those covered. Though admittedly ïï collides in Bold. Who uses that, anyway?
BTW, if you want to support High Valyrian, check whether Qy and Qȳ collide.
1 -
Christian Thalmann said:<…> Though admittedly ïï collides in Bold. Who uses that, anyway ?
5 -
Another overlooked ligature is the rz-ligature. Not that it is absolutely nescessary, but it can be so elegant when done well. I know I've seen one, but I can't find any pictures of it at the moment. And I guess it's primarily Polish that benefits from such a ligature.
0 -
Oh, that reminds me... I do have those in one of my previous fonts.
3 -
Maybe this is a helpful source: http://www.urtd.net/x/cod/1
-
Christian Munk said:Another overlooked ligature is the rz-ligature. Not that it is absolutely nescessary, but it can be so elegant when done well. I know I've seen one, but I can't find any pictures of it at the moment. And I guess it's primarily Polish that benefits from such a ligature.0
-
Jack Jennings said:ïï, fð, fþ all seem like the worst letter combinations to try and pronounce…0
-
The double /lslash/ can also occur in Polish buts it's extremely rare, such as surnames like Kołłątaj and Jagiełło. I haven't seen any examples of this occurring in printed texts but handwritten examples could possibly have a single wavy styled slash located at the top of both /l/ ascenders. relevant TD link3
-
John Hudson said:The German c_h and c_k combinations seem to have entirely fallen out of use in 'antiqua' (roman) typography, where they never looked entirely comfortable anyway. I believe they're still standard for correct blackletter orthography, though.
Unifraktur Maguntia http://unifraktur.sourceforge.net/ supports:
Some fonts also have longs_c_h, longs_s, longs_longs_k, longs_longs_t, t_t.2 -
This is the repertoire of ligatures I'm using in my font projects:
4 -
Igor, you could handle that set with a much smaller number of contextual ligating glyphs.0
-
John Hudson said:Igor, you could handle that set with a much smaller number of contextual ligating glyphs.1
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 803 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 622 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 542 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 485 Typography
- 303 History of Typography
- 114 Education
- 68 Resources
- 499 Announcements
- 80 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 165 Miscellaneous News
- 270 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports