I came across this find on the Sami wikipedia site. Without having digged into details yet, I’m under the impression that it contains some apparently unencoded characters. Any insights?
The barred C/c would be a candidate, I think. And I would argue for the one that looks like Cyrillic soft sign as a separate Latin character. The others are encoded or composable with combining marks.
[Barred C/c is technically composable with combining overstrike, but Unicode a few years ago decided that such entities should be atomically encoded.]
Comments
[Barred C/c is technically composable with combining overstrike, but Unicode a few years ago decided that such entities should be atomically encoded.]
<blockquote>Some of these are not relevant for written Sami today.</blockquote>
Yes. But historical orthographies also need to be encoded in order to facilitate study and scholarly publishing.