Aside from the old standards—handgloves, hamburgefonts, and adhesion—what words are good for sketching letters? I find that Magenta and Magneto work well.
I don’t generally use full words for sketching, per se; but my preferred string for comparing & evaluating progress is Hamburgefontsplivdy.
Once, when I was seeking more real-world alternatives, two that I liked and seemed to be useful were Pantographic and vulgar hedonist. (Mostly because I tend to leave f’s for later. ;-)
Making Gravity Grade push outlay lips drink drift Resonance Sing Aloud Amphorae uneven, though I'm with Kent. I usually draw iterations of a single letter until I get whatever aspect of the thing I'm working on looking right, then move on. If I make coherent words, it's usually because I'm working quickly.
When messing around with pen and paper, I write nonsense that seems meaningful. My latest is ‘HAPTIC FEEDBACK and MORE’. Lots of potential for silly lettering. Otherwise when I explore potential for typeface ideas, I often write things like ‘garen’ and ‘argon’ and ‘Merz’.
If this is just for lettering fun that that's one thing but from the point of view of getting started on a font "adhesion" is good but so is Type Together's phrase "videospan". The reasons are the same. "magneto" is no good - for the same reason.
The reason is that you want shapes to play with that you really want letters that are good stand ins for the overall texture and which also do a good job of suggesting what the essential characteristics or "DNA" of the type will be. You also want letters that you can make a large number of test words with. In English an "e" is particularly ideal.
You don't want to repeat shapes more than you have to because it is inefficient. Hence if you have a d you don't need a bpq etc. Similarly if you have a n you don't need an m. You also don't want letters that tell you very little about the rest of the types face such as g in the double story version. It is a cul du sac design process within the font.
The great thing about "magneto" is that it has an an and e which are superficially similar because they have middle strokes but which must be treated so differently.
I think that a go to word seems less important than having an awareness of the relative utility of the letters you choose to your design process.
I like to use plinova because it has a diagonal letter (v), a round one (o), and a "rectangular" one (n), plus ascender and descender (p,l). With this letters you get the necessary info to develop almost all the others, except /s/t/z/f/. I prefer to draw those at the end of the process. I don't draw the /s/ in the beginning because it tells me too little about the rest of the words.
The first 'word' I usually produce is nihilim simply because those are the first letters I typically make. They repeat many shapes, so are easy to produce, and are good for quickly establishing weight, horizontal proportions and spacing norms. After that, I do the lowercase o, and test millioon, another good spacing word.
I understand why many designers like to use words that include some of the more 'expressive' letters such as lowercase a and g, and diagonal letters. But I reckon 90% of what makes a typeface work is in its stroke weights, proportions and spacing. I want to get those established first, and worry how to make the lowercase a charming later.
A good word for evaluating cyrillics is "фиброжелудка". You get "aeopy" for free (or get to draw a better 'у'), and many non-trivial cyrillic letters are included. "моветон" gives you four more letters to practice downscaling your capitals, and "минишпиц" is a good word to check if your typeface looks too much like a railroad track or a picket fence.
minimum is what I usually start with when I instruct my students on minuscule writing. UNIVERSITÄTSBIBLIOTHEK is what they learn to hate when we practise Capitalis.
In fonting my lowercase take-off is nuhm (nun, ihm, nur, minni…). Hamburgefonstiv or Hamburghepfonsity is always at hand, as well as daumenchor/Daumenchor or Rovenbaum. In the correction process I make use of Endumachtoligryphe Apfendygarboscimuth Dampfguldenchorist Embaroughsteplicy Chambourgent Chordavimentus Drauchendiplom Buchstabengoldy Hengoldyframpusch Endiquamorphyse Alberyndephromagintu Weihnachtsoratyrium Zwölfte Daumenchorsymphonie Downton Abbey Road and similar stuff. For viewing capitals I like e.g. ANCHORAGE, VANCOUVER, DYKUMAPHONIE, SYMPHONIEKONZERTABEND.
In order to view certain language-specific letter combinations I look at stauchverplützlischkeitung whoughlythecouldinguishty beauxondèraistonagenoîtous ghiamoglichennondiscezza nieszczącyłytwyckiczyskiec adameiraquenhãmosadação questrasientechoiudadeñación uitelijkeendischaachtjeshoud.
Comments
For no good reason, I used "fringed chasuble" when designing Spinoza. 11 years of "fringed chasuble". I don't recommend it.
I don’t generally use full words for sketching, per se; but my preferred string for comparing & evaluating progress is Hamburgefontsplivdy.
Once, when I was seeking more real-world alternatives, two that I liked and seemed to be useful were Pantographic and vulgar hedonist. (Mostly because I tend to leave f’s for later. ;-)
It's available.
I thought you meant sketch as in loose/preliminary rendering.
Hu?
If this is just for lettering fun that that's one thing but from the point of view of getting started on a font "adhesion" is good but so is Type Together's phrase "videospan". The reasons are the same. "magneto" is no good - for the same reason.
The reason is that you want shapes to play with that you really want letters that are good stand ins for the overall texture and which also do a good job of suggesting what the essential characteristics or "DNA" of the type will be. You also want letters that you can make a large number of test words with. In English an "e" is particularly ideal.
You don't want to repeat shapes more than you have to because it is inefficient. Hence if you have a d you don't need a bpq etc. Similarly if you have a n you don't need an m. You also don't want letters that tell you very little about the rest of the types face such as g in the double story version. It is a cul du sac design process within the font.
The great thing about "magneto" is that it has an an and e which are superficially similar because they have middle strokes but which must be treated so differently.
I think that a go to word seems less important than having an awareness of the relative utility of the letters you choose to your design process.
shoplift
Warning: Do not sketch this word over and over at airport gates, you will be stopped for suspicious behavior.
I understand why many designers like to use words that include some of the more 'expressive' letters such as lowercase a and g, and diagonal letters. But I reckon 90% of what makes a typeface work is in its stroke weights, proportions and spacing. I want to get those established first, and worry how to make the lowercase a charming later.
In fonting my lowercase take-off is nuhm (nun, ihm, nur, minni…).
Hamburgefonstiv or Hamburghepfonsity is always at hand, as well as daumenchor/Daumenchor or Rovenbaum.
In the correction process I make use of
Endumachtoligryphe
Apfendygarboscimuth
Dampfguldenchorist
Embaroughsteplicy
Chambourgent
Chordavimentus
Drauchendiplom
Buchstabengoldy
Hengoldyframpusch
Endiquamorphyse
Alberyndephromagintu
Weihnachtsoratyrium
Zwölfte Daumenchorsymphonie
Downton Abbey Road
and similar stuff.
For viewing capitals I like e.g. ANCHORAGE, VANCOUVER, DYKUMAPHONIE, SYMPHONIEKONZERTABEND.
In order to view certain language-specific letter combinations I look at
stauchverplützlischkeitung
whoughlythecouldinguishty
beauxondèraistonagenoîtous
ghiamoglichennondiscezza
nieszczącyłytwyckiczyskiec
adameiraquenhãmosadação
questrasientechoiudadeñación
uitelijkeendischaachtjeshoud.