Why are there so many new monospaced typefaces?

jectives
jectives Posts: 7
in Type Business
Excuse my ignorance if the number has been genuinely stagnant, and I'm only just now noticing how many new releases are monospaced, but I've clocked far more mono (and semi-mono) fonts in 2026 than I did in 2025.

Is there a strong demand for monospaced fonts? Did software make it easier to turn a proportional font into a monospaced one? If you released a monospaced typeface this year, can you tell me why?

I've asked a number of foundries/type designers this year, but I rarely get a straight answer. Is the increase in monospaced releases a real trend, or am I simply experiencing the frequency illusion?

Thanks,
Curtis
Tagged:

Comments

  • James Puckett
    James Puckett Posts: 2,059
    It’s a long running trend. I think that Kris Sowersby kicked it off with Pitch, a wonderful typeface that renewed interest in monospaced fonts from both typographers and type designers. It’s also a fun to think about a different paradigm in spacing and to not have to kern a typeface.
  • Mark Simonson
    Mark Simonson Posts: 1,813
    edited November 8
    I think @Thomas Phinney is right about demand for them rising. I’ve recently had a serious (well, enthusiastic, anyway) request to expand my Anonymous Pro family, which I released in 2009 and haven’t done an update for since 2018 2010.
  • Stephen Coles
    Stephen Coles Posts: 1,054
    edited November 8
    I agree with James that the trend has been steadily rising for at least a decade. I’ve been waiting for the fad to fade because I find it played out and unsuitable for most purposes, but the trendsetters continue to push it, and foundries continue to fuel the fire. Some of this interest comes from coding, as Thomas says, but I think the driver is primarily aesthetic. Many factors: 
    • After the 2005–2015 period of dull minimalism, there’s an increased interest in type that looks slightly “off” or idiosyncratic, and that look can come from the adjustments required to make every letter the same width.
    • Some typographers use monopaced type as shorthand for “unstyled” content, inspired by the history of unformatted, typewritten text as a draft manuscript. Ironically, today, the monospaced stuff is so funky it has the opposite effect. It is also generally far less readable than proportional text, so I believe several paragraphs of mono text are a disservice to the content.
    • For type designers looking to expand existing families, a mono provides an avenue when the standard paths of weight, width, size, sans, and serif have been taken. And yes, it’s a nice break from spacing and kerning!
  • John Hudson
    John Hudson Posts: 3,909
    You’ll know that the fad has faded, Stewf, when Tiro releases a monospaced font with our usual impeccable after-the-fact timing.
  • James Puckett
    James Puckett Posts: 2,059
    I look forward to Tiro Mongolian Mono.
  • Nick Shinn
    Nick Shinn Posts: 2,416
    As you just asked outright, Curtis, that would have required some introspection on the part of designers, and effort in putting together a sentence or two. So it’s not surprising you were disappointed. 

    Try putting the questions you mentioned above in a multiple choice quiz. But what more to ask?

    My experience: I made a monowidth typeface many years ago, Panoptica, but it was also unicase, so not really part of any trend. However, I did release Bodoni Egyptian Mono in 2023. It’s part of a typeface I started on in pre-OpenType days (during the previous millennium!) then upgraded and extended the family for OpenType. That typeface kind of looks like a classic typewriter face, and extending the family has been a long-term project. And, as Stephen mentioned, monowidth is a break from spacing and kerning. So I went ahead, and made it variable too. Therefore, be sure to include, in your survey, “Was this an extension to an already published typeface?”
  • FontInsider
    FontInsider Posts: 9
    I think it's never gone away, oddly enough you will always find OCR being used in the some of the worse cases (in my opinion it's just as bad as comic sans). But thats because it's free/in the OS and inexperienced designers/creators classify it as "techy" looking.

    Tech is having another boom the past few years (similar to that of the .com boom), so monospace fonts can easily capture that "techy" vibe when you want a brand or project to give off vibes of innovation, code, complexity, etc. 

    Maybe it's a trend, so be it, there will always be trends, they come and go.
  • Mirco Schiavone
    Mirco Schiavone Posts: 8
    I think the aesthetic of modularity and therefore of something that has a certain "order" appeals to many graphic designers.
  • Mirco Schiavone
    Mirco Schiavone Posts: 8
    edited November 9
    I've released a mono subfamily to my RT Dromo last year. It made sense conceptually since the whole proportional typeface was already inspired by a monospace font to begin with and it seemed like a good addition. As a side note they seem to be licensed together quite often.

Categories