Is Multiple Substitution decomposing a lig. glyph?, when and why you have to do it
WAY KYI
Posts: 140
To me, Multiple Substitution feature is doing decomposition of a lig. glyph and
not sure why you have to do it. I do not grasp the concept of it.
Why in the first place you do a lig. glyph with two or more glyphs and then decompose them
back to two/more glyphs later. I knew there must be a valid reason why you do it, so what is the reason?
Can you kindly show me the example codes and the reason, when it needs this feature?
Thanks
not sure why you have to do it. I do not grasp the concept of it.
Why in the first place you do a lig. glyph with two or more glyphs and then decompose them
back to two/more glyphs later. I knew there must be a valid reason why you do it, so what is the reason?
Can you kindly show me the example codes and the reason, when it needs this feature?
Thanks
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
It doesn't need to decompose a ligature - it just substitutes one glyph with more than one glyph. See some examples here: https://simoncozens.github.io/fonts-and-layout/features-2.html#multiple-substitution3
-
Thank you very much again. There are so much information beginner like me need to learn. Thanks0
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 483 Type Design Critiques
- 560 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 649 Type Business
- 844 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 517 Typography
- 119 Type Education
- 321 Type History
- 77 Type Resources
- 110 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 31 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 544 Announcements
- 88 Events
- 112 Job Postings
- 170 Type Releases
- 173 Miscellaneous News
- 275 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 120 Suggestions and Bug Reports