Is Multiple Substitution decomposing a lig. glyph?, when and why you have to do it
WAY KYI
Posts: 130
To me, Multiple Substitution feature is doing decomposition of a lig. glyph and
not sure why you have to do it. I do not grasp the concept of it.
Why in the first place you do a lig. glyph with two or more glyphs and then decompose them
back to two/more glyphs later. I knew there must be a valid reason why you do it, so what is the reason?
Can you kindly show me the example codes and the reason, when it needs this feature?
Thanks
not sure why you have to do it. I do not grasp the concept of it.
Why in the first place you do a lig. glyph with two or more glyphs and then decompose them
back to two/more glyphs later. I knew there must be a valid reason why you do it, so what is the reason?
Can you kindly show me the example codes and the reason, when it needs this feature?
Thanks
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
It doesn't need to decompose a ligature - it just substitutes one glyph with more than one glyph. See some examples here: https://simoncozens.github.io/fonts-and-layout/features-2.html#multiple-substitution3
-
Thank you very much again. There are so much information beginner like me need to learn. Thanks0
Categories
- All Categories
- 40 Introductions
- 3.6K Typeface Design
- 787 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 606 Type Business
- 443 Type Design Critiques
- 534 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 135 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 82 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 475 Typography
- 298 History of Typography
- 112 Education
- 65 Resources
- 488 Announcements
- 77 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 157 Miscellaneous News
- 267 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 115 Suggestions and Bug Reports