What a rip off!
Comments
-
You mean, how do they feel about the example that started this thread? Sounds to me like they released it.0
-
Separately, how does the MyFonts panel feel about font 'gesture' cribbing? That is to say, one takes a copy of an existing font, runs it through a distressing filter and calls it a new creation?
When the Review Board sees a font submitted which is clearly a copy of an existing font but has been re-traced, tweaked, and resubmitted as their own, that new foundry is rejected.0 -
Stuart and others: As with so many things, the answer is “It depends.”
Do these “funky” variations take away sales from the original font?
http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/dtc-funky-fonts/
I doubt it.
Is this based on others’ outlines?
http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/typeotones/frankie/
Probably not, I can’t say. Can you?
Is this a lame concept for a font?
http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/aah-yes/stubble/
Hell yes.
How is this any different?
http://typophile.com/node/38063#comment-233376
Ethically or legally I’d say it isn’t. But context – creation date, author, intention – matters, too.6 -
Thank you Sara and myfonts for acting so quick on pulling the offending font. You guys are awesome!
3
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 488 Type Design Critiques
- 571 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 657 Type Business
- 869 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 527 Typography
- 121 Type Education
- 326 Type History
- 80 Type Resources
- 111 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 32 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 560 Announcements
- 95 Events
- 116 Job Postings
- 169 Type Releases
- 179 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 114 Suggestions and Bug Reports