TruFont as a complement or...
Comments
-
I’m curious, in what sense do you consider RoboFont a specialist tool?Nikolaus Waxweiler said:FontLab 5 seems like something I don't want to use, 6 appears to be much better though (the feature page has my mouth watering). It however remains in development with no release date I can find. I can't find any info on UFO support for FontCreator, that's a dealbreaker. And the UFO format isn't even that good. This leaves only Glyphs, with RoboFont as a specialist tool.
The way I see it, RoboFont is a font editor framework which can (and must) be tailored to your needs. It is more of a general tool in my opinion.0 -
Frameworks are for specialists, no?2
-
A tool that needs tailoring to be useful is a specialist tool, as you need to know what you need and how to get there efficiently.
4
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 486 Type Design Critiques
- 561 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 654 Type Business
- 853 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 519 Typography
- 119 Type Education
- 323 Type History
- 77 Type Resources
- 112 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 33 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 550 Announcements
- 91 Events
- 114 Job Postings
- 170 Type Releases
- 174 Miscellaneous News
- 276 About TypeDrawers
- 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 120 Suggestions and Bug Reports