Alternate Helvetica /a?

Lately, I've been documenting the typography of Chicago's public transportation, namely the CTA ‘L’. I'm used to a certain amount of variability, but I've noticed this bizarre variation on Helvetica's /a that omits the signature curve on the upper bowl.
The only solid date I can provide is that the “Priority Seating” sticker is likely original from 1992-1994—when the train (3200 series, train #3264) was built. Was this a common modification?
Also, it really appears to me that the sticker and “These facilities for passengers only…” are just part of the font, while the “Rapid Transit” appears custom-made (note the differences between the two appearances of /a).

Answers

  • Craig Eliason
    Craig Eliason Posts: 1,485
    Looks like the /a in Unica.
  • Thomas Phinney
    Thomas Phinney Posts: 3,089
    edited October 3
    It doesn’t look like Helvetica to me. I don’t think it is Unica either.

    Look at how the terminals on a, e, s and g are all slightly off a straight vertical/horizontal cut. Also the slope on the mid-stroke of the “a”…

    The “a” is reminiscent of Unica, but those off-90° angles are not. (From what I can find of original Unica samples online. They are not as common as one would like.)

    Edit: clarified that I was thinking of 90° angles, vertical or horizontal.
  • Nick Shinn
    Nick Shinn Posts: 2,301
    edited September 8
    Some kind of “Standard.”
    There were many typositor neo-grotesques, and Chicago was Graphic City (Oz Cooper’s stomping ground), and home of VGC for instance.
    So I would connect the dots and assume the font is a local product, if not Akzidenz Grotesk.
  • Evie S.
    Evie S. Posts: 76
    As I understand it, the perfect terminals on Helvetica are from the digital era. Here is a couple examples I could find of a similar specimen from Letterform Archive, one with obvious non-horizontal terminals (/e in general, /s in Geist), and one annotated (rather annoyingly, sorry!)
    Here's another sign I found today. The numerals scream Helvetica to me, especially with the underbite of /9:
    And (to me) a gorgeous example of pre-digital Helvetica, again with a slightly diagonal terminal in the /e:

  • Depending on the method, hand-cut sign vinyl following a template was/is around at fabricators. As far as the “a” and associated typeface, the Chicago area was home to pre-PostScript era font publishers (of varying reputation) since Ludlow as Nick Shinn pointed out. It seems like a case of near-vetica.
  • BBS had been gone a long time when those signs were produced.
  • Peter Bain
    Peter Bain Posts: 18
    Separately, I've found an American foundry specimen for Helvetica Medium that shows some angled terminals, in the the "e" and "s". And in some sizes the cap I and lowercase l look nearly identical. Lastly, to reply to the OP's comment about consistent horizontal endings, they show up in Mergenthaler VIP samples, so pre-date digital versions. 
  • Nick Shinn
    Nick Shinn Posts: 2,301
    If you can’t identify it as being a particular font named “Helvetica,” it should not be called Helvetica; it is an unidentified neo-grotesque.

    Over the years, many foundries have published neo-grotesques that are me-too Helveticas,—Apple’s San Francisco, for instance.

    Why, I even had a go at the genre myself!
  • Thomas Phinney
    Thomas Phinney Posts: 3,089

    https://fontsinuse.com/uses/3220/it-s-the-real-thing-coca-cola-ads-1969-74
    https://fontsinuse.com/uses/6655/stevie-wonder-music-of-my-mind-album-art

    All examples of early Helvetica, pre-digital, with either perfectly horizontal cuts, or very close. Certainly nothing like that crazy 9 shown above for the Chicago Transit Authority. I would believe that some of those could maybe be Helvetica, and that the terminals in e and g might not have quite perfectly horizontal cuts in pre-digital Helvetica. But at the same time, some of Evie’s examples seem way off.

    Here for example is a catalog example showing the New York City Transit Authority’s Graphic Standards Manual for 1970, and the typeface is “Standard Medium”: https://www.pixartprinting.it/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Graphic-Standards-Manual.jpg and the relevant page of Fonts In Use that explains how this is another name for Akzidenz Grotesk.  https://standardsmanual.com/pages/type-specimenhttps://fontsinuse.com/typefaces/217963/nycta-standard

    This does indeed match Evie’s sample from NYC, I think?

    (For extra confusion, Berthold also has a Helvetica-ish typeface called Standard, which is closer to Helvetica. Not sure what it’s relationship to the NYCTA Standard typeface is, just offhand.)
  • Dan Reynolds
    Dan Reynolds Posts: 182
    edited October 3
    .