A verie bad fount.
Nick Shinn
Posts: 2,338
Following up on this previous discussion, I’ve now published the typeface in question.
Auld English® has three novel contextual features (default long-s, pseudo-random effect for body-text letterpress mimickry, and “re-writing”), but I thought I’d focus on the re-writing here, as the design space for this was informed by John Hudson and Thomas Phinney, with their hard line on the inviolability of canonical text—which is why I’ve released the “Spell” versions of the typeface as a free experiment. In particular, the transliteration is quite plausible for most text, but makes a hash of proper names!

Auld English® has three novel contextual features (default long-s, pseudo-random effect for body-text letterpress mimickry, and “re-writing”), but I thought I’d focus on the re-writing here, as the design space for this was informed by John Hudson and Thomas Phinney, with their hard line on the inviolability of canonical text—which is why I’ve released the “Spell” versions of the typeface as a free experiment. In particular, the transliteration is quite plausible for most text, but makes a hash of proper names!

0
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 488 Type Design Critiques
- 571 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 658 Type Business
- 870 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 528 Typography
- 121 Type Education
- 327 Type History
- 80 Type Resources
- 111 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 32 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 560 Announcements
- 95 Events
- 116 Job Postings
- 169 Type Releases
- 179 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 114 Suggestions and Bug Reports