A verie bad fount.
Nick Shinn
Posts: 2,331
Following up on this previous discussion, I’ve now published the typeface in question.
Auld English® has three novel contextual features (default long-s, pseudo-random effect for body-text letterpress mimickry, and “re-writing”), but I thought I’d focus on the re-writing here, as the design space for this was informed by John Hudson and Thomas Phinney, with their hard line on the inviolability of canonical text—which is why I’ve released the “Spell” versions of the typeface as a free experiment. In particular, the transliteration is quite plausible for most text, but makes a hash of proper names!

Auld English® has three novel contextual features (default long-s, pseudo-random effect for body-text letterpress mimickry, and “re-writing”), but I thought I’d focus on the re-writing here, as the design space for this was informed by John Hudson and Thomas Phinney, with their hard line on the inviolability of canonical text—which is why I’ve released the “Spell” versions of the typeface as a free experiment. In particular, the transliteration is quite plausible for most text, but makes a hash of proper names!

0
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 489 Type Design Critiques
- 568 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 662 Type Business
- 868 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 526 Typography
- 121 Type Education
- 326 Type History
- 79 Type Resources
- 112 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 33 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 564 Announcements
- 95 Events
- 116 Job Postings
- 170 Type Releases
- 182 Miscellaneous News
- 278 About TypeDrawers
- 55 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 121 Suggestions and Bug Reports