A verie bad fount.
Nick Shinn
Posts: 2,374
Following up on this previous discussion, I’ve now published the typeface in question.
Auld English® has three novel contextual features (default long-s, pseudo-random effect for body-text letterpress mimickry, and “re-writing”), but I thought I’d focus on the re-writing here, as the design space for this was informed by John Hudson and Thomas Phinney, with their hard line on the inviolability of canonical text—which is why I’ve released the “Spell” versions of the typeface as a free experiment. In particular, the transliteration is quite plausible for most text, but makes a hash of proper names!

Auld English® has three novel contextual features (default long-s, pseudo-random effect for body-text letterpress mimickry, and “re-writing”), but I thought I’d focus on the re-writing here, as the design space for this was informed by John Hudson and Thomas Phinney, with their hard line on the inviolability of canonical text—which is why I’ve released the “Spell” versions of the typeface as a free experiment. In particular, the transliteration is quite plausible for most text, but makes a hash of proper names!

0
Categories
- All Categories
- 47 Introductions
- 4K Typeface Design
- 495 Type Design Critiques
- 578 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 672 Type Business
- 886 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 540 Typography
- 125 Type Education
- 333 Type History
- 82 Type Resources
- 113 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 33 Lettering Critiques
- 80 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 569 Announcements
- 100 Events
- 116 Job Postings
- 170 Type Releases
- 182 Miscellaneous News
- 270 About TypeDrawers
- 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 114 Suggestions and Bug Reports