OSX Sequoia weird issue with ligatures
Jacques Le Bailly
Posts: 93
I just got a question by a customer.
When setting text with their custom typeface in Sequoia and IOS 18, the ligatures fi and fl behave as if they have the width of a lowercase f.
For example if the type the word 'Confirm', the r is positioned on top of the i.
They tried it in several apps.
Does anyone recognize this ? Fonts were generated about a year ago.
When setting text with their custom typeface in Sequoia and IOS 18, the ligatures fi and fl behave as if they have the width of a lowercase f.
For example if the type the word 'Confirm', the r is positioned on top of the i.
They tried it in several apps.
Does anyone recognize this ? Fonts were generated about a year ago.
0
Comments
-
OSX Sequoia or IOS 18? Which apps?0
-
On both systems.
One app I am sure of is text editor on OSX Sequoia. The others were screen shots0 -
Could it be related to Ligature Caret List information in GDEF table being interpreted incorrectly? Just a guess.Were the fonts produced with Glyphs by any chance?0
-
I was thinking of the Ligature Caret as well as the potential issue. But there are no carets in the file.
Why the question about Glyphs ?0 -
Because Glyphs makes the addition of Ligature Caret fairly automatic with Set Anchors routine and many may not realize they added it. (Not saying this would have been you.)
0 -
Are there other f-ligatures that don’t exhibit the issue? If so, that would give you a point of comparison. But you probably already checked that. 🤔What happens with 'ffi' — does it behave with width of one 'f' or two? or ... ?
0 -
As far as I can tell it happens in the 'fi' and 'fl' ligatures. In the samples sent by the client, the 'ff' ligature isn't used, so I cannot compare. There is no 'ffi' of 'ffl' ligature in the typeface.
I don't have Sequoia installed yet myself.0 -
If it is an OpenType layout feature related issue within the font, then I suggest to use the Proofing tool from FontCreator to reveal the problem.0
-
This sounds kind of like a font caching issue to me. You say this is a custom font, which I assume you're developing. Have you sent them multiple versions of the font?0
-
I delivered the font almost a year ago. So it shouldn't be a cache problem0
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 798 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 617 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 541 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 483 Typography
- 301 History of Typography
- 114 Education
- 68 Resources
- 498 Announcements
- 79 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 165 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports