A slab serif inspired by Selectric Pyramid, Landi Corsivo and others
marcomastri
Posts: 3
Hello everyone,
I feel a little guilty asking for feedback after being a lurker here for years, but I’ve never felt I had much to add to the discussions. That said, this forum has been an invaluable learning resource for me, and now I’m hoping to get some help with a thing I’ve been working on. While it’s not the first typeface I’ve started, it’s the first time I feel it’s starting to getting somewhat decent.
Re-drawing Pyramid was fun, but the wonky spacing and proportions of some letters don’t really hold up: I’d like this typeface to be a pleasing reading experience at least on magazine length texts. At this point I still feel more comfortable working on a grid, so in order to get a more uniform texture I subdivided it to 18 units (Monotype!), and then again to 36 for a couple of letters. I also rounded the joints in the shoulders of m/n/h, the bowls of b/d/p/q, the vertical serifs in s/c/S/C/G, and opted for a two-storey g, which I like better for longer texts.
Then, I started a really rough draft for the italic. I started with a simple slanted version of the upright, only with one-storey a/g. Later, inspired by Landi Corsivo, I tried rounded end strokes. I feel that this second version is more interesting and offers better emphasis in texts, but I’m a bit worried it could be a bit overdone.
As for feedback, I’m mainly looking for thoughts on two areas:
- How does the overall quality of the roman design hold up at the moment? Are there any specific areas that need to be improved?
- Which version of the italic should I keep to work on? The rounded version seems better for emphasis in text, but could certain glyphs result too distracting? I’m especially worried about the y: I really like it, but obviously v/w and maybe x/z should harmonize with it, and it could be a bit too frilly?
Thank you all for your thoughts!
Marco
PDF attached below:
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
Then, I started a really rough draft for the italic. I started with a simple slanted version of the upright, only with one-storey a/g. Later, inspired by Landi Corsivo, I tried rounded end strokes. I feel that this second version is more interesting and offers better emphasis in texts, but I’m a bit worried it could be a bit overdone.3
-
Thank you, that's a very good point.IMO it's better to overdo it and bring it back into line, than keep things unexplored and neutral.
0 -
marcomastri said:... I’d like this typeface to be a pleasing reading experience at least on magazine length texts. ... I also rounded the joints in the shoulders of m/n/h, the bowls of b/d/p/q, the vertical serifs in s/c/S/C/G, and opted for a two-storey g, which I like better for longer texts.In my opinion, rounding the bowls of p/b/d/d creates rather negative effect in general, especially p's bottom is notably unbalanced.Also I don't like the v. Despite it is a compact font, I don't think there is a need to make the v that much compressed, so it loses itlesf in the text. I can almost confuse it with r.Upscaling it seems to improve things notably:
Regarding italic, I like the slanted version better.
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 803 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 618 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 542 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 483 Typography
- 301 History of Typography
- 114 Education
- 68 Resources
- 499 Announcements
- 80 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 165 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports