Home› Type Business
Options

Sunsetting Fonts.com etc.

Ray LarabieRay Larabie Posts: 1,379
in Type Business
I got an email from Monotype informing affiliates that they're sunsetting their non-MyFonts sites. Has this been announced elsewhere? Is it just those three sites?

We’ve made the decision to discontinue several of our legacy sites which includes Linotype.com, Fontshop.com, and Fonts.com throughout the next year.

Comments

  • Options
    Laurence PenneyLaurence Penney Posts: 49
    Wow, in Linotype’s Events section there’s an article dated August 10, 1994:

    1st International Type Design Contest


  • Options
    James PuckettJames Puckett Posts: 1,971
    I’m not surprised by any of these. They want people to forget Linotype and Fontshop and roll that brand equity over into MyFonts. Fonts.com should be an incredibly valuable domain but the design has been shit ever since their big hyped redesign which probably sucked all the value out. It won’t be long before typography.com just points to myfonts.com, too.
  • Options
    Ray LarabieRay Larabie Posts: 1,379
    I've sensed for a while that fonts.com might shut down. When they updated their database, they didn't fully merge it with myfonts.com. I have many fonts from fonts.com that aren't on myfonts.com, and I can't update them on the Monotype platform. If they wanted to keep fonts.com, they would've integrated this feature. James also noticed the site seemed outdated. I found broken links on their sales pages last year. I'm not surprised they're going to close them, and I wonder why it took so long. While these brands have value, a poor website can drive customers away. Maintaining mutliple sites with almost identical products always seemed like a money pit to me. They probably could have made mutiple front ends for MyFonts and it might have been cheaper than trying to jury rig these disparate sites for all these years.
  • Options
    Jens KutilekJens Kutilek Posts: 340
    https://www.myfonts.com/pages/closure-announcement-faq
  • Options
    Chris LozosChris Lozos Posts: 1,458
    Perhaps the name Monotype sounds too much like monoply for them and they wanted to segway from it :-)
  • Options
    JoyceKettererJoyceKetterer Posts: 793
    I think it makes sense for Monotype to consolidate their brand under one name, and I think it is good for the rest of us.  The point of multiple brands is to confuse customers into thinking they are dealing with different companies.  
  • Options
    Thomas PhinneyThomas Phinney Posts: 2,754
    If I were Monotype I would have merged these sites already.

    In the short term it is work and pain to merge them, what with the need to migrate order histories. But in the long term the efficiency gains will be huge.

    I hope the previous foundry legacies are preserved and celebrated as much as possible, but eventually merging them into the behemoth is part of what one expects from the acquisition process. Ah well!
  • Options
    Dave CrosslandDave Crossland Posts: 1,394
    I hope as Laurence says the historical meta page are well archived 
  • Options
    Ray LarabieRay Larabie Posts: 1,379
    @JoyceKetterer Multiple brands can be beneficial when targeting distinct customer segments without much overlap. For instance, Old Navy, The Gap, and Banana Republic successfully cater to different market segments. The same goes for beauty brands like Clinique, MAC, and Smashbox. However, Volkswagen Group's approach with multiple luxury brands (Bentley, Bugatti, Porsche, Lamborghini) can seem excessive, but they have historical brand value to maintain. If the Monotype brands had been structured similarly—MyFonts as "The Gap," FontShop as "Banana Republic," and a new brand similar to Creative Market representing "Old Navy"—it would have been logical. But, they ended up with one "Gap" and multiple "Banana Republics," which muddled their market distinction.
  • Options
    JoyceKettererJoyceKetterer Posts: 793
    @Ray Larabie I've never really thought that consumer goods analogies work for font licensing sales.  While it is true that different sales platforms seem to have different customer bases, and a font that does poorly on one may do well on the other, licensing is a complicating factor.  A company like monotype wants to use their EULA for all of the platforms.  They are then essentially selling the same thing on all platforms.


  • Options
    Dave CrosslandDave Crossland Posts: 1,394
    The Eula is critical, second only to the typeface itself, and that's where the segmentation would make sense. Gotham remains only available on typography.com and myfonts search results page for it redirects there. 
  • Options
    Mark SimonsonMark Simonson Posts: 1,654
    Are you sure about that? It looks like you can buy it on MyFonts.com.
  • Options
    JoyceKettererJoyceKetterer Posts: 793
    I have heard anecdotally from clients about a year ago that Monotype was testing different EULA terms on different platforms. Most wont notice but those who did were really upset about it.
  • Options
    Dave CrosslandDave Crossland Posts: 1,394
    Sorry Mark, I'm suggesting that's what they should have done, instead of the current vaporizing of brand value. 

    I am also speculating against different Eula terms 
  • Options
    Mark SimonsonMark Simonson Posts: 1,654
    Ah, okay. I misunderstood. And I agree.
  • Options
    Jacques Le BaillyJacques Le Bailly Posts: 88
    I started my type design career as an intern at Linotype in 1998 🥲
  • Options
    Dave CrosslandDave Crossland Posts: 1,394
    I must assume that the brand-word meant zero to the people making the decision, and to the random people they polled.

    My experience is that since everyone who's anyone reads and authors rich text, they all think they know something about type. Oh well :D
  • Options
    TypedesignerTypedesigner Posts: 31
    edited December 2023
    Linotype was a company rich in tradition and very well known in Germany. It is a pity that the Linotype brand, which stood for outstanding quality, is not being developed further. The co-operation with the Monotype / Linotype team in Bad Homburg was good. Apparently, the Bad Homburg branch no longer exists.
  • Options
    John J. BlairJohn J. Blair Posts: 29
    Monotype merely wants to be a SaaS operation like Adobe. FORGET them, I'm glad  I use Affinity!!!!!
  • Options
    Nadine ChahineNadine Chahine Posts: 55



    RIP Linotype. We had fought so hard to save you. 
  • Options
    John ButlerJohn Butler Posts: 248
    Recently I had occasion to look up Garamond MT, bundled with Microsoft Office, on MyFonts, just to look at the glyphs and available weights. I can’t find it at all. Nor on fonts.com. I can find dozens of other Garamonds, just not Monotype’s own.
  • Options
    Florian HardwigFlorian Hardwig Posts: 263
    John, try FontHaus.
  • Options
    John ButlerJohn Butler Posts: 248
    Holy crap, I had no clue FontHaus was still around!
  • Options
    John J. BlairJohn J. Blair Posts: 29
    I've logged in to MyFonts for the LAST TIME!!!!!

Sign In or Register to comment.