Fonts being software, not “art,” I don’t know how relevant this would be, but it‘s certainly thought-provoking.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/ai-works-not-copyrightable-studios-1235570316/By the way, I‘m already sick of journalists calling a thousand different kinds of software “AI,” as I’m sure you are too.
Comments
I can see how one COULD take it as a general principle, and I don’t know that it would be any harder to apply to design patents than to copyright. It may well emerge as such a broader thing, which becomes instantiated in more areas.