Monotype Foundry Partners
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e820/2e820abfd29fbd84a9ea73ed4dea50f6eef02e44" alt="James Montalbano"
James Montalbano
Posts: 109
This appeared in my LinkedIn feed recently:
https://www.monotype.com/foundries
Old news? New News?
I so rarely visit LinkedIn it could have been there for months!
https://www.monotype.com/foundries
Old news? New News?
I so rarely visit LinkedIn it could have been there for months!
1
Comments
-
Interesting read, but... no. Once burned, twice shy.
0 -
The recent changes in Monotype's model present several intriguing aspects that I'm keen to explore. However, given the stipulations of the new agreement, I'd be in direct violation upon signing it. I believe that several established foundries, including mine, may face challenges with this model. Over the decades, I've engaged in multiple subscription services and exclusive contracts, making it challenging to align with the new agreement's terms. While it's evident that considerable effort and planning have gone into the creation of this new system, it regrettably positions me outside of its purview.7
-
0
-
For me, this is a nicer way to say that from now on 25% is the foundry's share and 75% is Monotype's. That's how they imagine the future...5
-
I think it’s more likely that they imagine a future of owning the fonts, setting prices, and paying a 10% royalty just like the record industry.7
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 811 Font Technology
- 1.1K Technique and Theory
- 628 Type Business
- 449 Type Design Critiques
- 547 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 137 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 84 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 493 Typography
- 307 History of Typography
- 115 Education
- 71 Resources
- 505 Announcements
- 81 Events
- 106 Job Postings
- 151 Type Releases
- 166 Miscellaneous News
- 271 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 117 Suggestions and Bug Reports