Tabular punctuation in the font with both Lining and Oldstyle Figures
Michael Rafailyk
Posts: 146
Hello!
I want to add a space, period, and comma (maybe something else usefull for the tables?) to the Tabular Figures feature, but the font contains both Lining and Oldstyle Figures, so it's become more complicated and I'm stuck a bit in the dependencies.
Classes
Lookups
Lining
Here, Tabular and Proportional lookups are dependent from what has been substituted before it – in the Lining and Oldstyle. So it's a chain where the first step is a substitution of space by space.osf in the Oldstyle lookup, and the next step is a substituton of space.osf by space.tosf in the Tabular lookup.
The problem
Lining Tabular figures have different advance width (in my case) than Oldstyle Tabular figures, so I need to have different space.tf and space.tosf. That mean, I also need to have different space and space.osf. It's 4 different versions of the space glyph (and for period and comma too) where space and space.osf are identical (the same width) just with the different names.
I'm wondering if this intermediate duplicate (space.osf) can be avoided. I know it's possible to apply a few unicodes to one glyph, but not the a few names, so it should be different separated glyphs. Is that right?
I want to add a space, period, and comma (maybe something else usefull for the tables?) to the Tabular Figures feature, but the font contains both Lining and Oldstyle Figures, so it's become more complicated and I'm stuck a bit in the dependencies.
Classes
@lf = [zero one two three four five six seven eight nine]; @osf = [zero.osf one.osf two.osf three.osf four.osf five.osf six.osf seven.osf eight.osf nine.osf]; @tf = [zero.tf one.tf two.tf three.tf four.tf five.tf six.tf seven.tf eight.tf nine.tf]; @tosf = [zero.tosf one.tosf two.tosf three.tosf four.tosf five.tosf six.tosf seven.tosf eight.tosf nine.tosf]; @lfPunct = [space period comma]; # original @osfPunct = [space.osf period.osf comma.osf]; # identical to original @tfPunct = [space.tf period.tf comma.tf]; # by Lining Tabular width @tosfPunct = [space.tosf period.tosf comma.tosf]; # by Oldstyle Tabular width
Lookups
Lining
sub @osf by @lf sub @osfPunct by @lfPunctOldstyle
sub @lf by @osf sub @lfPunct by @osfPunctProportional
sub @tf by @lf sub @tfPunct by @lfPunct sub @tosf by @osf sub @tosfPunct by @osfPunctTabular
sub @lf by @tf sub @lfPunct by @tfPunct sub @osf by @tosf sub @osfPunct by @tosfPunct
Here, Tabular and Proportional lookups are dependent from what has been substituted before it – in the Lining and Oldstyle. So it's a chain where the first step is a substitution of space by space.osf in the Oldstyle lookup, and the next step is a substituton of space.osf by space.tosf in the Tabular lookup.
The problem
Lining Tabular figures have different advance width (in my case) than Oldstyle Tabular figures, so I need to have different space.tf and space.tosf. That mean, I also need to have different space and space.osf. It's 4 different versions of the space glyph (and for period and comma too) where space and space.osf are identical (the same width) just with the different names.
I'm wondering if this intermediate duplicate (space.osf) can be avoided. I know it's possible to apply a few unicodes to one glyph, but not the a few names, so it should be different separated glyphs. Is that right?
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
/space is default (proportional)
So order your tnum lookup before your onum lookup and in tnum havesub space by space.tf
then in your onum lookup havesub space by space.osf sub space.tf by space.tosf
J.
0 -
I understood, to order tnum/pnum first, and then onum/lnum. Interesting.
My case is just reversed (onum/lnum first and then tnum/pnum) and it looks like this:
onumsub space by space.osf
tnumsub space by space.tf sub space.osf by space.tosf
That is, the number of steps is the same. So, in any case, there should be 4 (not 3) versions of space. O'k, looks like it's normal practice.
Thanks John.0 -
Why not make both oldstyle and lining tab figures with the same width?
Imagine that a typographer has prepared a complex table with oldstyle figures and the client says “Nah, change the figures to lining”.
(And while you’re at it, make sure that different weights of tab figures have the same width too.)3 -
Nick, that make a sense. I didn't even thinked about it.
I think it's possible to leave both proportional figures as they are, and just find a certain common advance width for Tabular Linings and Tabular Oldstyle figures only.
And it also simplifies the logic, to only two versions of punctuation instead of four.
Thanks for your thoughts.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 803 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 622 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 542 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 485 Typography
- 303 History of Typography
- 114 Education
- 68 Resources
- 499 Announcements
- 80 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 165 Miscellaneous News
- 270 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports