Kerning pairs you can’t do without
Claudio Piccinini
Posts: 681
While I am fine-tuning the kerning of a typeface I am finalizing, I was wondering — bearing in mind the expected needs of the average-to-advanced user of typefaces aimed at extended text setting — which could be the kerking pairs (or groups of pairs) which one might not immediately think about that is effectively handy to have incorporated in a professional font.
Or, inversely, these you can easily do without (ordmasculine and ordfeminine are used with letters?).
Any thought or consideration is welcome! :-)
Or, inversely, these you can easily do without (ordmasculine and ordfeminine are used with letters?).
Any thought or consideration is welcome! :-)
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
Claudio Piccinini said:...which could be the kerking pairs (or groups of pairs) which one might not immediately think about that is effectively handy to have incorporated in a professional font.
One of the texts I use in Fontlab 8 to test the kerning is at the following address:
Kerning Test · Typefacts
I hope it can help you.3 -
Yves Michel said:Claudio Piccinini said:...which could be the kerking pairs (or groups of pairs) which one might not immediately think about that is effectively handy to have incorporated in a professional font.
One of the texts I use in Fontlab 8 to test the kerning is at the following address:
Kerning Test · Typefacts
I hope it can help you.
I was thinking more if anyone has certain pairs (not necessarily "linguistic") which have proved to be handy/important, pairs which maybe one does not always think about.
Clearly at some point it becomes a choice how much to incorporate, but I was thinking of possible suggestions from typesetters rather than from us typedesigners (i.e. "I’d love not to have to kern that pair by hand each time!").0 -
One peculiar instance I had to kern manually was r/A (as in Adobe Pr/Ae). Something you would never give a second thought until it appeared in a navbar and not in running text. Ideally these would be also kerned with a space between, a narrow space between, etc... one can have dreams.
1 -
Adam Jagosz said:One peculiar instance I had to kern manually was r/A (as in Adobe Pr/Ae). Something you would never give a second thought until it appeared in a navbar and not in running text. Ideally these would be also kerned with a space between, a narrow space between, etc... one can have dreams./a\ /b\ /c\ /d\ /ð\ /e\ /f\ /g\/h\ /i\ /j\ /k\ /l\ /m\ /n\ /ŋ\/o\ /p\ /q\ /r\ /s\ /t\ /u\/v\ /w\ /x\ /y\ /z\ /þ\ /æ\\a/ \b/ \c/ \d/ \ð/ \e/ \f/ \g/\h/ \i/ \j/ \k/ \l/ \m/ \n/ \ŋ/\o/ \p/ \q/ \r/ \s/ \t/ \u/\v/ \w/ \x/ \y/ \z/ \þ/ \æ/
I was also thinking of more conventional situations, belonging to historical typography, which one might not consider a priority. I know there are professional designers which do not even consider numerals a priority, so I was wondering about the various experiences.
Thanks Adam!0 -
Anything digital related really. Passwords looking like they have a space could be problematic? Underscore to underscore is one example I saw a tweet about recently, due to the use of them side by side in usernames. r/ is another example for anyone that wants to refer to threads on Reddit. Also CamelCase due to brand names such as UserZoom.
Edit: another one often overlooked is phonetic glyphs that are often poorly kerned or clash.0 -
Consecutive underscores are not so much a kerning pair issue as a matter of changing uses. Traditionally they are designed to run together for the purpose of setting long blanks. In today's world, when it would be helpful to be able to count the number of underscore characters in some strings, we must decide what the default spacing should be based on which use case seems more likely. Perhaps unfortunately, as type designers, we've all learned the "proper" way and are slow to reconsider it.
3 -
I always make sure to check // as in http://2
-
James Hultquist-Todd said:I always make sure to check // as in http://0
-
I always check the “nT” pair as in “OpenType”—and usually look at “nTn” and “oTo” combinations just to see that I am keeping things balanced.1
-
f? f* f’ f) f®
These should also be designed to fit nicely.
1 -
Thomas Phinney said:I always check the “nT” pair as in “OpenType”—and usually look at “nTn” and “oTo” combinations just to see that I am keeping things balanced.
I use a string like this, adapted to all lowercase letters:aAarm Basic aCard Date Far
aJackal Karma Lad aMage aOath
aPasqua Rail aTake aValue
aXandar aYale
For economy reasons, I tended to exclude pairs which for the usual forms of letters are very unlikely to happen, but /M is included as, while in many alphabets can have vertical sides, when the inclination of vertical stems is marked, it could benefit from some kerning.0 -
Why "aPasqua"?0
-
What about: McCarty?0
-
Craig Eliason said:Why "aPasqua"?1
-
Chris Lozos said:What about: McCarty?
cAct cCcel Eco Fclub cJcain cKcal
cLc cMcnally cOcra Pci Rcine
cTcine cVclose cXcity cYcleSo, yes, I thoughr about possible cC<lowercase> benefitting from kerning, but in general the cC pair fares fine by itself, and so the Ca (which is nonetheless included in my /a basic string. It’s a work in progress.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 40 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 793 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 609 Type Business
- 443 Type Design Critiques
- 536 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 135 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 82 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 478 Typography
- 300 History of Typography
- 113 Education
- 65 Resources
- 494 Announcements
- 79 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 161 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports