Touching serifs or good spacing?
Igor Petrovic
Posts: 297
So in the Black master spacing is tighter and serifs of diagonal letters V, W, Y (K, R, X) are merged.
That can be solved by the kerning, but that leaves even more space than needed. Do you keep letters touching or remedy this at the expense of odd spacing?
Ligatures can be effective but there would be a significant amount of them, which is currently not an option for me. I have two kinds of serifs that make the contact unnatural.
That can be solved by the kerning, but that leaves even more space than needed. Do you keep letters touching or remedy this at the expense of odd spacing?
Ligatures can be effective but there would be a significant amount of them, which is currently not an option for me. I have two kinds of serifs that make the contact unnatural.
0
Comments
-
Another option would be contextual alternate forms for the trailing glyph--much less work than ligatures. That's what I'd do here, because that little bit is really irksome.2
-
@Craig Eliason Great, thanks! Just to check, it's ok to keep the letters connected?
I am asking because in every typeface I have quickly tested they are separated. Which raised the question is my overall spacing good. Numbers say that Thin weight might be too tight. On the other side, such a wide typeface+generous space takes too much line space.
0 -
Opinions may vary, but I don't have a problem with such occasional touching. If we accept that an /f/l in a ligature can be connected, I don't see why a /V/E shouldn't be allowed a graceful overlap.
5 -
I like your typeface btw!The Hairline spacing is fine.1
-
I don't like rules ;-)
1 -
Alternatively, might it be well to flatten that leading serif always?
3 -
Christian Thalmann said:I like your typeface btw!The Hairline spacing is fine.K Pease said:Alternatively, might it be well to flatten that leading serif always?
Thanks, maybe...I am kind of attached to it and it's seen in A, N, M, X, V, W, and Y. Maybe it's easier to add contextual alternates for 4 than to edit 7 letters. But I will consider your suggestion since it would work even for combinations I possibly overlook.
0 -
A/M/N and V/W/X/Y could be considered two subcategories. I would venture that this serif treatment on the apex is more valuable to the first group than the second. The three letters in the first group should be able to carry it as a theme, and a smooth slide from horizontal can be the second group's thing. Then calt would need no more than N.
1 -
You raised the important theory topic—how much is enough to carry a theme. The thing is that "the curly apex" doesn't appear in lowercase at all, and that is my main concern, is it enough to keep it in only three capital letters.
Thanks for your insights, they will help me to make a decision0 -
To add an opinion: there’s nothing wrong with overlapping as a technique to minimize spacing (sometimes there’s actually no better alternative at all), but it still should be done nicely. On your first screenshot, the sticking out parts look more like a noise or mistake. Also, keep in mind that VV too easily turns into W.1
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 798 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 617 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 541 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 483 Typography
- 301 History of Typography
- 114 Education
- 68 Resources
- 498 Announcements
- 79 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 165 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports