OTF/CFF global/local subroutines
TLDR: in CFF is it legal to call a local subroutine from a global subroutine?
Hi everyone,
I'm currently working on some software that parses/manipulates charstrings that represent the glyphs in CFF (Compact Font Format) fonts.
While working on the part that handles global and local subroutines, I was initially working under the assumption that:
- charstrings can call local and global subroutines (i.e. use
callsubr
andcallgsubr
) - local subroutines can call other local and global subroutines (i.e. use
callsubr
andcallgsubr
) - global subroutines can only call other global subroutines (i.e. use
callgsubr
)
however, this seems not to be the case: when I ran some tests on a number of font files, I discovered that for example in "Nimbus Roman Italic" (a standard font installed on Ubuntu Linux) global subroutines exist that contain the callsubr
opcode, thereby trying to call local subroutines.
In the context of OTF fonts this can be worked around relatively unambiguously as OTF restricts CFF to contain only one CharSet and therefore only one private dict with local subroutines. But in a general case this seems like a bad idea.
Question:
- did I misunderstand the restrictions? (i.e. is this in fact legal behavior?)
- or are those font-files ill-formed?
Categories
- All Categories
- 40 Introductions
- 3.6K Typeface Design
- 787 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 606 Type Business
- 443 Type Design Critiques
- 534 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 135 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 82 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 475 Typography
- 298 History of Typography
- 112 Education
- 65 Resources
- 488 Announcements
- 77 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 157 Miscellaneous News
- 267 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 115 Suggestions and Bug Reports