Naming the 3s

Nick Shinn
Nick Shinn Posts: 2,216
edited November 2021 in Technique and Theory
Is there a naming convention to distinguish between these two different styles?

Comments

  • Do we need anything beyond the simple "round-top" and "flat-top"?
  • Or these?


  • Ray Larabie
    Ray Larabie Posts: 1,435
    I call the y on the left a "u-ey".  Like the slang for U-turn and it rhymes with screwy.
  • Cory, the ‘y’ on the left could be called a ‘schoolbook y,’ along with single story ‘a’  and ‘g’s (schoolbook a, schoolbook g; like a child would write these letters).
  • I think of the y on the left a cursive y.
  • John Savard
    John Savard Posts: 1,135
    edited November 2021
    I was going to ask, how about these:
    but in the process of preparing the image, I learned that the one on the right is called the "Lunate" epsilon, at least within Unicode.
    Which is all very well, but it turns out that the one on the left is apparently the default one, yet in most Greek typefaces I'm familiar with, the one on the right is the normal one used in text, and the one on the right is only used for some specialized purposes in mathematical notation.
    Double-checking, though, in the first Greek text I found, the epsilon on the left was used, but then I found a second which used the lunate epsilon as the default:
    so it is a stylistic variation between typefaces, even if, for mathematical notation, it is necessary to have two Unicode codepoints available so that the distinction can be made.
    And, of course, I therefore believe that the Unicode consortium should reserve another codepoint for the non-lunate epsilon symbol, so that the Greek small letter epsilon may have either form in a font.
  • I think Ʒ should be pronounced [ʒ].
    Okay, okay, I'll see myself out, sheesh...
  • So going with Christian's suggestion, we can refer to the baker's three as 'zhree'. The other one could be called the 'butt-cheeks three'.
  • John Hudson
    John Hudson Posts: 3,227
    edited November 2021
    And, of course, I therefore believe that the Unicode consortium should reserve another codepoint for the non-lunate epsilon symbol, so that the Greek small letter epsilon may have either form in a font.
    Unicode resists providing multiple codepoints for the same character. There are plenty of examples of characters that have free stylistic forms in some contexts and specific required forms in other contexts. Lowercase epsion can have either form in a text font, just not in a math font (that said, Porson is unusual in favouring a lunate epsilon form).