The Future of Font Naming: is it still unethical to use the same font name?
Comments
-
The problem in the font naming world, essentially, is the same thing which has been so great in so many other ways: accessibility. In the bad old days, in order to publish a font, you had to actually get a foundry to sell it, and so there were only a few fonts, but they were (mostly) good and the designers got to choose good names.Now that everyone and their grandma is releasing some font (even if it's a low quality handwriting font), all the good names are taken!Of course, it is possible in some cases to use a name which has been used before, if you check it out with the correct authorities. For instance, with GFS Heraklit, we were worried that we might be prohibited from using this name by trademark law, but after some research and inquiries we got the OK. (Note that this was made much easier by the fact that the original Heraklit is no longer being marketed.)3
-
Good old days when all you had to do was to call someone in Rochester
4
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.8K Typeface Design
- 478 Type Design Critiques
- 558 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 645 Type Business
- 836 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 512 Typography
- 119 Type Education
- 318 Type History
- 75 Type Resources
- 110 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 31 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 538 Announcements
- 87 Events
- 111 Job Postings
- 168 Type Releases
- 171 Miscellaneous News
- 274 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 119 Suggestions and Bug Reports