Adobe Spark and font EULAs
John Nolan
Posts: 50
I just had a look at Adobe's Spark app.
The web interface allows one to upload fonts to their interface to use when creating social media posts with the app.
They do enjoin the user to make sure the EULA allows this use, but I'm not sure how to proceed. The fonts are restricted to the user's account, and projects exported as jpgs or pdfs, so the fonts don't go out in "wild".
In all fairness, it doesn't seem too far off desktop use, but what do people thing?
The web interface allows one to upload fonts to their interface to use when creating social media posts with the app.
They do enjoin the user to make sure the EULA allows this use, but I'm not sure how to proceed. The fonts are restricted to the user's account, and projects exported as jpgs or pdfs, so the fonts don't go out in "wild".
In all fairness, it doesn't seem too far off desktop use, but what do people thing?
2
Comments
-
Seems like something that one could reasonably expect many EULAs would permit. They ask the user to make sure it is within the EULA bounds. So, seems reasonable on Adobe’s part.
Personally, if it were my EULA, I would permit it, no problem. It wouldn't even seem like one of the more liberal things in my EULA. I would rank enabling this as below “editable embedding” in permissiveness.0 -
So the Spark (and the font) are just used to generate static art for social media posts?0
-
James Puckett said:So the Spark (and the font) are just used to generate static art for social media posts?0
-
@John Nolan It looks like this has been going on since June 2018.
I am aware Adobe is working on what they call "Bring your Own Fonts" but had been assured we could review the pop up before it went live. Probably they meant this with regards to the full system but am surprised that it's up on Spark now (as a test)?
I'm having a little trouble finding the functionality (it's clearly changed since that article was written). Would you be willing to post a screenshot?0 -
@Thomas Phinney - The issue isn't whether it is permitted in the EULA (which, I agree, is a good idea and something I intend to add) but whether the end user actually knows if they have a license. I find that a considerable number of people at companies think they have a license when their company didn't buy one for them. With direct desktop installation this is something we've long ago accepted, but I think changes in technology should improve related technological problems, not compound them.3
-
JoyceKetterer said:I'm having a little trouble finding the functionality (it's clearly changed since that article was written). Would you be willing to post a screenshot?
Sorry, I didn't notice your request earlier.1 -
It is more than troubling to see that Adobe asks users of their software/service to acknowledge having been granted a permission – the permission to modify/convert font software licensed from another party – which Adobe very well knows is not granted by most foundries’ EULAs.
3
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 798 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 617 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 541 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 483 Typography
- 301 History of Typography
- 114 Education
- 68 Resources
- 498 Announcements
- 79 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 165 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports