In regard of my post https://typedrawers.com/discussion/3328/glyphs-extensions-for-fonts-containing-basic-western-set#latest
…I have a full Latin Pro glyphs set now. In question are the accented glyphs and some other new glyphs.
New glyphs are red, blue and green cells. The Red cells should be allright, blue and green I am unsure. In question are for instance the alignment of dcaron, width of the bar in dcroat, Hbar, hbar, and the like; the positioning of the accents in general.
kgreenlandic is actually a k without ascender, right?
what do you think of the napostrophe?
the accent.case range are accents for capital letters, right? caron.salt and commaaccent.salt are for lowercase use, right?
I’d be glad if you want comment this work.
*all of the above applies for the major use of the glyphs. There might be an obscure language, somewhere, where some other version may be right. E.g. I was recently corrected that "obsolete" versions were used for a Himalayan language. But IMPO those are not terribly big markets and there may be some debate even inside the native speakers which version is right for different reasons.