Revamping TypeDrawers?
Sujan Sundareswaran
Posts: 17
Now, I understand that everything here pretty much works, and no complaints on performance, but every time I visit TypeDrawers, it feels like I'm time travelling a decade back.
Is a revamp an option? Making it more mobile-friendly(maybe a PWA?), a more modern look and feel for the UI, and so on and so forth? Does a revamp make sense?
Is a revamp an option? Making it more mobile-friendly(maybe a PWA?), a more modern look and feel for the UI, and so on and so forth? Does a revamp make sense?
Tagged:
1
Comments
-
Just so you know: the – ah – mobile friendly re-design of Typophile, with its post titles in 80 pt and the post text in a 7 pt sans in grey, was what finally and definitely drove me away there.
(After stoically enduring the endless font ID requests under all possible sub-fora except for the Font ID Request page itself, the prodiguous amounts of unhandled spam, and necro-posts reviving decade-and-a-half threads on why Helvetica Neue does not suck.)7 -
I agree that typophile's redesign is terrible, but that doesn't mean a redesign of typedrawers has to be. Fwiw, I would not classify typophile as mobile friendly at all.
I think a redesign of typedrawers would be nice, but on the other hand I think it functions pretty well as is, and I foresee endless debate after/before/during the redesign, so I'm not sure it would be worth it.1 -
I see no need for a revamp. The site works just fine as it is.12
-
TypeDrawers works just fine. If it isn't broke, don't try to "fix" it.
7 -
Bringing back the Like button is the only revamp I need.14
-
I like that Typedrawers has a simple and effective design. It isn't selling anything and it isn't a showcase for some web trend. It works just fine on mobile. There's nothing that needs to change just to serve current novelty.7
-
Hmm, maybe “revamp” was too strong a word. Maybe “spruce up” would have been closer. What I had in mind was some basic house-keeping: Retina icons, slightly bigger buttons on mobile, threaded replies for posts and so on.
Now, this really wouldn’t warrant a complete rewrite of the whole codebase, just some tweaks here and there.
@Jasper de Waard is right, it’d be impossible to get everyone on the same page for a revamp, but these basic improvements might be easier.
Others, thoughts now?
1 -
I'd like to see core/system fonts used for the message text font as missing glyphs have impeded discussions.6
-
I agree that the glyph support should be as large as possible, for obvious reasons.
Design and mechanics work fine for me.1 -
TypeDrawers uses out-of-the-box forum software. So, some things are very easily configured, some not so much so.
Agree that extended character set support would be nice. And the icons for flag, etcetera could be retina-friendly.
For everything else... if these things are easily done, then that would be cool. But I won’t be sad if some of these items are not changeable or are considered unimportant.
0 -
I second the motion. Does Vanilla have an app that users can use for better mobile? I find myself using FB Groups a lot, or Slack, both of which work quite well on mobile.
0 -
If we fix what ain't broken, new errors might creep up. The biggest one is ensuring future-compatability for whatever mobile devices spring up in the next 5 years. I would bet my money on robust, not delightful.2
Categories
- All Categories
- 40 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 795 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 613 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 539 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 480 Typography
- 300 History of Typography
- 113 Education
- 67 Resources
- 495 Announcements
- 79 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 162 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports