Upper store of the lc a

Hi beautiful people,  :)
since some time I have begun to notice that the two-story form of /a in some fonts has a hook that is, too my eye, imbalanced compared to the counter. I see it pushed to the left so much that I have begun to wonder if I am not missing something. We are talking not only recent fonts, but classics like Garamond.

To my knowledge upper parts should be almost always smaller then the bottom ones, like in an /eight, and an /a should stand balanced on its own as well as in text. Also, an extended hook should need something to balance on the bottom right hand side, and that's often not the case.

Am I missing some important peace of information or is it just people not knowing the rules? Please elaborate.


  • Chris LozosChris Lozos Posts: 1,223
    There is no absolute,  The upper and lower need to balance each other as well as fit with other glyphs like 's" and "e"
  • Ori Ben-DorOri Ben-Dor Posts: 286
    Another example of an "unbalanced" lower case a that works: Gill Sans. Compare it to Mallory, for instance. They take completely opposite directions, and yet both work just fine.

    A similar difference between serifs: Adobe Text vs. Palatino.

    Perhaps the most important observation here, in my opinion, is this: Concerning letter shapes, "right" and "wrong" isn't an intrinsic matter, or at least not just. It depends on traditions, on how any new letter shape refers to and echoes existing ones. If there's a tradition of some sort of "unbalanced" lower case a's, which is clearly the case here, then that becomes "right".

    To illustrate that idea, referring to Mark's comment, note that while S, s and 8 are conceptually symmetrical, still noticeably smaller upper half, which breaks the visual symmetry, has become traditional and therefore legitimate.
  • When I was first learning to distinguish typefaces by eye, I realized that Caslon's dead giveaway is the /a that looks like it's lunging leftward. I always like when I see a design that seems to reference it.

    Quirks like that are great when they're executed confidently, I think.
  • The size of the bowl on the /a is often more related to the size of the eye of the /e […]
    Which is not surprising if one looks at the underlying construction coming forth from the movements with the broad nib:

    The /ae diphtong shows the relation nicely.
  • Nick ShinnNick Shinn Posts: 1,532
    There’s not much point in considering a letter shape in isolation.
    Letters are social creatures.

  • Not surprisingly, because of the organic morphological relationship between the /a and the /e, in Garamont’s Gros Canon Romain (which appeared for the first time in1555) these letters share the same width (together with the /c). Sharing character widths is, of course, also the case for other letters, such as n and o, as can be explored with LeMo. The justified (for fixed mould-registers)  matrices on the photos are from the collection of the Museum Plantin-Moretus.

    BTW, one can clearly see that the /a leans a bit backwards. This is for the simple reason that otherwise it will optically incline forward. The same (actually reversed) is the case for the /t.
Sign In or Register to comment.