Some fonts have junctions that all end in a single node, some that all end in two nodes, some that use a mix of both depending on the glyph (the first two images are from the same glyph). Is there a rhyme or reason to it?
I believe there are two rationales for the shear: — Sharp corners can render in an ungainly way when the curves inescapably turn into dots, especially on-screen. Doyald Young has recommended a minimum angle of 30° (although that's probably an "unscientific" rule of thumb). — It's an ink/light trap that's easy to deploy and does not result in distorted curves.
Ironically, the two-point node scales better. That’s because it is not so dependent on the resolution of the rendering mechanism.
Also, the sharpness of a single point node, especially in the groin of B, may be odd and uncomfortable in a typeface which has nothing else anywhere near as acute.
Comments
— Sharp corners can render in an ungainly way when the curves inescapably turn into dots, especially on-screen. Doyald Young has recommended a minimum angle of 30° (although that's probably an "unscientific" rule of thumb).
— It's an ink/light trap that's easy to deploy and does not result in distorted curves.
That’s because it is not so dependent on the resolution of the rendering mechanism.
Also, the sharpness of a single point node, especially in the groin of B, may be odd and uncomfortable in a typeface which has nothing else anywhere near as acute.