Icelandic - acceptable eth height?
Dave Rowland
Posts: 39
Comments
-
I doubt that you need to force it to the full height, especially in a display face. But I'm pinging my Nordic people now... :-)0
-
looks fine to me.
I’d rethink the gaps between base lc and tittles, though.
3 -
There were some good eth-and-thorn talks at ATypI in Iceland a few years back.
The eth ascender does not need to go to the full ascender height. Indeed, it would be very unusual for it to do so. (Not saying it *can’t*—but it should be dictated by the design rather than by a false assumption that this is the norm. Still, to be largely avoided, I gather.)
The bowl of the eth can be, and often is, smaller than that of other letters such as bdpq. That makes it easier to make the eth ascender shorter, as it generally should be. Your bowls are so small in this one that making the eth bowl smaller may not be reasonable in this case.2 -
Thanks! And cheers for the tittle advice - have looked again at those.
0 -
Addendum: you could actually afford to shorten that eth ascender even more. Make it more clearly in between x height and ascender height.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 798 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 617 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 541 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 483 Typography
- 301 History of Typography
- 114 Education
- 68 Resources
- 498 Announcements
- 79 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 165 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports