Icelandic - acceptable eth height?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33029/33029320805ba9850e3e672033029c1aa29d2d85" alt="Dave Rowland"
Dave Rowland
Posts: 39
Comments
-
I doubt that you need to force it to the full height, especially in a display face. But I'm pinging my Nordic people now... :-)0
-
looks fine to me.
I’d rethink the gaps between base lc and tittles, though.
3 -
There were some good eth-and-thorn talks at ATypI in Iceland a few years back.
The eth ascender does not need to go to the full ascender height. Indeed, it would be very unusual for it to do so. (Not saying it *can’t*—but it should be dictated by the design rather than by a false assumption that this is the norm. Still, to be largely avoided, I gather.)
The bowl of the eth can be, and often is, smaller than that of other letters such as bdpq. That makes it easier to make the eth ascender shorter, as it generally should be. Your bowls are so small in this one that making the eth bowl smaller may not be reasonable in this case.2 -
Thanks! And cheers for the tittle advice - have looked again at those.
0 -
Addendum: you could actually afford to shorten that eth ascender even more. Make it more clearly in between x height and ascender height.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 811 Font Technology
- 1.1K Technique and Theory
- 628 Type Business
- 449 Type Design Critiques
- 547 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 137 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 84 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 493 Typography
- 307 History of Typography
- 115 Education
- 71 Resources
- 505 Announcements
- 81 Events
- 106 Job Postings
- 151 Type Releases
- 166 Miscellaneous News
- 271 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 117 Suggestions and Bug Reports