Why is Franklin Gothic Wide so bad?
James Puckett
Posts: 1,993
Why is Franklin Gothic Wide so bad? I’m referring to Renshaw’s 1952 metal face. The curves are awkward, color is uneven, and some important lowercase letters have ugly acute points at their stroke terminals. ATF spent thrity years getting rid of the sloppy old gothics, and then in 1952 they threw their standards out the window for this one. Is there a story about how this came to be?
1
Comments
-
@James Puckett—if you have an image of it, it would be nice to add that to your OP so that less knowledgeable people can learn from the coming replies, too!0
-
1
-
It is what it is. Looks fine to me. I don’t mind the Vicky-grot quality.0
-
Back then, they were solving metal type problems with metal type solutions. Today we have the luxury of avoiding many of those problems.
1 -
I can't say I'm a huge fan, but it's not as awful as I would have expected from your description.
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 799 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 617 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 541 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 483 Typography
- 301 History of Typography
- 114 Education
- 68 Resources
- 498 Announcements
- 79 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 165 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports