Why is Franklin Gothic Wide so bad?

James Puckett
Posts: 2,013
Why is Franklin Gothic Wide so bad? I’m referring to Renshaw’s 1952 metal face. The curves are awkward, color is uneven, and some important lowercase letters have ugly acute points at their stroke terminals. ATF spent thrity years getting rid of the sloppy old gothics, and then in 1952 they threw their standards out the window for this one. Is there a story about how this came to be?
1
Comments
-
@James Puckett—if you have an image of it, it would be nice to add that to your OP so that less knowledgeable people can learn from the coming replies, too!0
-
1
-
It is what it is. Looks fine to me. I don’t mind the Vicky-grot quality.0
-
Back then, they were solving metal type problems with metal type solutions. Today we have the luxury of avoiding many of those problems.
1 -
I can't say I'm a huge fan, but it's not as awful as I would have expected from your description.
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 44 Introductions
- 3.8K Typeface Design
- 474 Type Design Critiques
- 554 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 637 Type Business
- 826 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 505 Typography
- 120 Type Education
- 312 Type History
- 73 Type Resources
- 109 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 30 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 528 Announcements
- 84 Events
- 110 Job Postings
- 164 Type Releases
- 169 Miscellaneous News
- 273 About TypeDrawers
- 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 117 Suggestions and Bug Reports