Why is Franklin Gothic Wide so bad?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed21b/ed21bb5953bfdaced75aaa987b832e432ccab470" alt="James Puckett"
James Puckett
Posts: 2,003
Why is Franklin Gothic Wide so bad? I’m referring to Renshaw’s 1952 metal face. The curves are awkward, color is uneven, and some important lowercase letters have ugly acute points at their stroke terminals. ATF spent thrity years getting rid of the sloppy old gothics, and then in 1952 they threw their standards out the window for this one. Is there a story about how this came to be?
1
Comments
-
@James Puckett—if you have an image of it, it would be nice to add that to your OP so that less knowledgeable people can learn from the coming replies, too!0
-
1
-
It is what it is. Looks fine to me. I don’t mind the Vicky-grot quality.0
-
Back then, they were solving metal type problems with metal type solutions. Today we have the luxury of avoiding many of those problems.
1 -
I can't say I'm a huge fan, but it's not as awful as I would have expected from your description.
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 811 Font Technology
- 1.1K Technique and Theory
- 628 Type Business
- 449 Type Design Critiques
- 547 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 137 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 84 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 493 Typography
- 307 History of Typography
- 115 Education
- 71 Resources
- 505 Announcements
- 81 Events
- 106 Job Postings
- 151 Type Releases
- 166 Miscellaneous News
- 271 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 117 Suggestions and Bug Reports