Authoritative source for the ATypI Vox classification
            
                
                    Johannes Neumeier                
                
                    Posts: 399                
            
                        
                
                                    
                                  in Type History             
            
                    Hello Typedrawers,
I was wondering if anybody is aware of a publicly available source for the ATypI Vox classification, either the originally accepted or the amended 2010 version? The wikipedia page hasnot link for the original, a citation needed information on the Gaelic addendum section, as well as a broken link to the 2010 Dublin meeting notes. The ATypI website seems to not have any information either, as far as I can find. Does this SIG yield any more information for members? (Not a member myself I must confess, not yet, anyway).
Cheers,
Johannes
                        I was wondering if anybody is aware of a publicly available source for the ATypI Vox classification, either the originally accepted or the amended 2010 version? The wikipedia page hasnot link for the original, a citation needed information on the Gaelic addendum section, as well as a broken link to the 2010 Dublin meeting notes. The ATypI website seems to not have any information either, as far as I can find. Does this SIG yield any more information for members? (Not a member myself I must confess, not yet, anyway).
Cheers,
Johannes
            Tagged:
            
        
0          
            Comments
- 
            An English translation was published in Printing World, July 30, 1954, with a revision in August 8, 1956. Also published in Linotype Matrix 28 (1958).0
 - 
            Thanks for the hints, Stephen. The research databases I have access to naturally don't have those archived, but I found some confirming citations to "Printing World". Also, I now know the ATypI members area Wiki refers to an image I also seen published in "Adrian Frutiger Typefaces" by Osterer & Stamm, which seems to depict *some sort* of original. With the presumption that Vox's classification is widely accepted (as in: the source, if not as classification system) this should be sufficient for my purpose. If anybody indeed knows of a newer "official" documentation, for example the meeting notes from the 2010 Dublin addendum, I would be much obliged.0
 - 
            The 2010 Dublin addendum consisted of a resolution that the membership present was in favor of adding Uncial as a top-level classification. It did not reiterate the full spec.3
 
Categories
- All Categories
 - 46 Introductions
 - 3.9K Typeface Design
 - 485 Type Design Critiques
 - 561 Type Design Software
 - 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
 - 654 Type Business
 - 853 Font Technology
 - 29 Punchcutting
 - 519 Typography
 - 119 Type Education
 - 323 Type History
 - 77 Type Resources
 - 112 Lettering and Calligraphy
 - 33 Lettering Critiques
 - 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
 - 550 Announcements
 - 91 Events
 - 114 Job Postings
 - 170 Type Releases
 - 174 Miscellaneous News
 - 276 About TypeDrawers
 - 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
 - 120 Suggestions and Bug Reports
 

