The Rules have been updated
Dyana Weissman
Posts: 331
Hello everyone,
Recently, the moderation team decided The Rules required some clarification. Please take a moment to check them out. Then we hope you continue to enjoy discussing type and its many charms.
Recently, the moderation team decided The Rules required some clarification. Please take a moment to check them out. Then we hope you continue to enjoy discussing type and its many charms.
1
Comments
-
It would be more responsible to publish previous and current versions, i.e., run a diff on the file. Essentially, Typedrawers admins, who have proven themselves unresponsive in my direct experience, have emulated the worst practices of, say, credit-card companies or banks and have simply changed the rules without telling us what changed.
One glaring deficiency is Stewf’s face glaring glaringly at us. He doesn’t even run the joint anymore.0 -
What changed is we added point #6 in light of some material which we consider still copyrighted being shared here.0
-
And the rules post was created by Stephen at the time when he was "run[ning] the joint" so his image remains.0
-
So you’re directly unresponsive to a complaint about his baleful visage. I don’t see why emeritus status even exists.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 803 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 622 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 542 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 485 Typography
- 303 History of Typography
- 114 Education
- 68 Resources
- 499 Announcements
- 80 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 165 Miscellaneous News
- 270 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports