The Rules have been updated
Dyana Weissman
Posts: 331
Hello everyone,
Recently, the moderation team decided The Rules required some clarification. Please take a moment to check them out. Then we hope you continue to enjoy discussing type and its many charms.
Recently, the moderation team decided The Rules required some clarification. Please take a moment to check them out. Then we hope you continue to enjoy discussing type and its many charms.
1
Comments
-
It would be more responsible to publish previous and current versions, i.e., run a diff on the file. Essentially, Typedrawers admins, who have proven themselves unresponsive in my direct experience, have emulated the worst practices of, say, credit-card companies or banks and have simply changed the rules without telling us what changed.
One glaring deficiency is Stewf’s face glaring glaringly at us. He doesn’t even run the joint anymore.0 -
What changed is we added point #6 in light of some material which we consider still copyrighted being shared here.0
-
And the rules post was created by Stephen at the time when he was "run[ning] the joint" so his image remains.0
-
So you’re directly unresponsive to a complaint about his baleful visage. I don’t see why emeritus status even exists.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 490 Type Design Critiques
- 570 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 664 Type Business
- 868 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 529 Typography
- 123 Type Education
- 326 Type History
- 80 Type Resources
- 112 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 33 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 563 Announcements
- 94 Events
- 116 Job Postings
- 170 Type Releases
- 182 Miscellaneous News
- 278 About TypeDrawers
- 55 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 121 Suggestions and Bug Reports

