Soft proofing on a Mac
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3c3c/a3c3cb795c4eaf5f0e2ab8501137981f0315fcfe" alt="Simon Cozens"
Simon Cozens
Posts: 760
I don't know whether this is a problem with my font, my eyes or my software, but here goes anyway: I'm making slow and steady progress with Silson, my display sans. (Well, many steps backwards and a few steps forward, but enough of that.)
I'm finding that to improve spacing and kerning, I really need to print out specimen sheets on paper rather than look at the text on a screen. Part of the reason why I don't feel I'm getting reliable proofing on screen is because the spacing between glyphs, in OS X's PDF Preview application, appears to vary at different zoom levels. Here is a portion of the proof at 100%:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02343/0234304516089290e3580b666a4bda5982d76ca5" alt=""
It looks to me that in the word "and", the /a/n space is smaller than the /n/d space, and that there is an ugly gap between the /o/t of "cloth"; the /o seems to hang close to the /l. However, if I zoom in:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e80c/9e80ccdec8132b78c28784c737750f648cc8252c" alt="Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5019405/uploads/editor/94/xsiuly0yg1wv.png"
Actually the /a/n space is bigger than the /n/d space. (70 units between /a/n and 65 between /n/d.) Is that an optical distortion, though?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cda25/cda2585ad07f224d5a6bdcdcbc0c4ca2d204a58e" alt="Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5019405/uploads/editor/dp/68j5n3suzius.png"
I'm not claiming the spacing is perfect, but the /o is at least centered here.
Is it me, or is there some kind of smoothing/rounding/subpixel-grey-thing going on?
Looking at the PDF in Acrobat Pro, I see a bunch of similar but different issues. Here is Acrobat at the top and Preview at the bottom, both allegedly at 100% zoom factor:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8002b/8002bc8b2e5e886461e5153bcc8ed9c5fad34910" alt=""
The sizes are obviously different. In the Acrobat version, the positioning of the overshoot letters /e, /b, /o etc. seems to be lower - maybe that's a hinting problem? (I'm just using autohinting at present.) In the Acrobat version, the /b/y spacing of "by" seems loose; /m/o of "most" is very tight, but when zoomed in the /o sits nicely between /m and /s.
Obviously I could zoom in to avoid the problem but I know that makes you want to space things tighter. Are there some software or settings I can use to make a reliable proof on screen, or am I condemned to collaborating in the destruction of the Amazon rainforest? Or do I just need glasses?
I'm finding that to improve spacing and kerning, I really need to print out specimen sheets on paper rather than look at the text on a screen. Part of the reason why I don't feel I'm getting reliable proofing on screen is because the spacing between glyphs, in OS X's PDF Preview application, appears to vary at different zoom levels. Here is a portion of the proof at 100%:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02343/0234304516089290e3580b666a4bda5982d76ca5" alt=""
It looks to me that in the word "and", the /a/n space is smaller than the /n/d space, and that there is an ugly gap between the /o/t of "cloth"; the /o seems to hang close to the /l. However, if I zoom in:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e80c/9e80ccdec8132b78c28784c737750f648cc8252c" alt="Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5019405/uploads/editor/94/xsiuly0yg1wv.png"
Actually the /a/n space is bigger than the /n/d space. (70 units between /a/n and 65 between /n/d.) Is that an optical distortion, though?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cda25/cda2585ad07f224d5a6bdcdcbc0c4ca2d204a58e" alt="Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5019405/uploads/editor/dp/68j5n3suzius.png"
I'm not claiming the spacing is perfect, but the /o is at least centered here.
Is it me, or is there some kind of smoothing/rounding/subpixel-grey-thing going on?
Looking at the PDF in Acrobat Pro, I see a bunch of similar but different issues. Here is Acrobat at the top and Preview at the bottom, both allegedly at 100% zoom factor:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8002b/8002bc8b2e5e886461e5153bcc8ed9c5fad34910" alt=""
The sizes are obviously different. In the Acrobat version, the positioning of the overshoot letters /e, /b, /o etc. seems to be lower - maybe that's a hinting problem? (I'm just using autohinting at present.) In the Acrobat version, the /b/y spacing of "by" seems loose; /m/o of "most" is very tight, but when zoomed in the /o sits nicely between /m and /s.
Obviously I could zoom in to avoid the problem but I know that makes you want to space things tighter. Are there some software or settings I can use to make a reliable proof on screen, or am I condemned to collaborating in the destruction of the Amazon rainforest? Or do I just need glasses?
0
Comments
-
Buy a 5k iMac. $2,000 is a bargain for all the time you’ll save.
That said, if a font is intended for use on paper, you still need to print it and test it.3 -
Physically zoom out: roll your desk chair back a few feet!3
-
I always test with low-res fuzz. Export at well over double your target resolution. Make a Photoshop action to bicubic scale smooth to your target screen resolution.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 811 Font Technology
- 1.1K Technique and Theory
- 628 Type Business
- 449 Type Design Critiques
- 547 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 137 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 84 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 493 Typography
- 307 History of Typography
- 115 Education
- 71 Resources
- 505 Announcements
- 81 Events
- 106 Job Postings
- 151 Type Releases
- 166 Miscellaneous News
- 271 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 117 Suggestions and Bug Reports