OpenType Feature Format

Michael Jarboe
Posts: 265
I was looking closer at an OpenType 'zero' feature for the slashed zero replacement and realized it was written out using each grouping bracketed rather than having each separate grouping designated as a class.
Written like
I was just curious about this as it all gets decompiled so is it simply a case of the feature being easy enough to write out vs. using classes?
Written like
sub [zero zero.op zero.lt] by [slashzero slashzero.op zeroslash.lt]as opposed to
sub @zero1 by @zero2
I was just curious about this as it all gets decompiled so is it simply a case of the feature being easy enough to write out vs. using classes?
0
Comments
-
Yes, they're the same. Probably just a short enough list that someone didn't want to write a class.2
-
Both lines are using classes, the first are just unnamed classes. But anyway it is just syntactic sugar, substitution lookups does not use classes, so both are the same as:
sub zero by slashzero;
sub zero.op by slashzero.op;
sub zero.lt by zeroslash.lt;2 -
The good thing about creating classes is that you can use it in different lookups, without having to write the groups down more than once. If you are just going to use that group just once then you don't need a class.2
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 482 Type Design Critiques
- 560 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 649 Type Business
- 844 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 517 Typography
- 119 Type Education
- 321 Type History
- 77 Type Resources
- 110 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 31 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 544 Announcements
- 88 Events
- 112 Job Postings
- 170 Type Releases
- 173 Miscellaneous News
- 275 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 120 Suggestions and Bug Reports