Corpus Analysis: Why?

Options
Hi! Something that has always puzzled me is how type designers use corpus analysis in their process. How does knowing the frequency of glyphs, or glyph pairs influence your decision making?
In the non-Latin script arena, I can see that information as being useful if you're trying to determine which conjunct glyphs (via GSUB) to include in your font. But what else do you find it useful for? Just curious :)

Comments

  • Craig Eliason
    Options
    I imagine it'd be useful for strategizing ligatures in a connecting script.
  • James Puckett
    Options
    I’ve mostly used it regarding conjuncts in Devangari. And occasionally I use it to try and find out if and how a character is used when documentation of a character in a certain language is lacking.
  • Chris Lozos
    Options
    I rarely look at pair frequency anymore, and then only if I am wondering if I need bothering to kern a rarely if ever used combination.
  • Ray Larabie
    Options
    I use pair frequency in the case of textured designs where, instead of using cycling alternates, I use ligatures. For example, designs with scratches, splatters or pattern elements that span 2 or 3 letters. I used pair & triplet frequency charts from several languages to compile a master list.
  • Georg Seifert
    Options
    It can help deciding what kerning exeptions one should add. 
  • Dave Crossland
    Options
    I used 'em to design early phase sketch words; vowels + most common consonants