Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Thomas Phinney

About

Username
Thomas Phinney
Joined
Visits
985
Last Active
Roles
Member
Points
614
Invited by
Admin James Puckett
Posts
754
  • Re: TYPO Labs 2018 Berlin, April 12–14

    James: That was the talk I gave at the Kerning Conference this past spring—

    But there is plenty more to say! Looking forward to Typo Labs again.  :)
  • Re: Brain Sees Words As Pictures

    You'll need to define which version of “empiricism” you mean before anybody can disagree. But clearly personal and individual experience is rather limited compared to experimental method, and when one is talking about how the brain works, it is awfully easy to fool oneself and hard to do double-blind experiments on oneself. (Let alone have n much greater than 1.)


  • Re: When did the "Serif vs. Sans" derby started?

    Back when screens were much lower resolution, and LCD-specific strategies didn't exist yet (because they were dependent on LCDs which were not yet predominant), this idea was pretty obviously true. Screen fonts were specific pixel-based things and very different from print fonts. There just weren't enough pixels (and available sub-pixels) to do serif faces properly.

    Early screen-font legibility research easily confirmed this.

    Resolutions have improved immensely, and so have font rendering techniques. So the idea that sans serif is better for screen, while clearly true 30 years ago, began to change. Unfortunately, the current truth is not nearly as well known as the former truth. Nowadays I doubt anyone seriously familiar with the topic would make any blanket statement of sans serif superiority for screen use. But memes are hard to kill.
  • Re: Brain Sees Words As Pictures

    Studies have looked at the relative contribution of bottom-up word recognition from individual letters vs top-down word recognition, and found the ratio is something like 4:1, as I recall.
  • Re: Are OpenType superior and inferior numbers broken in Illustrator 2015/2017

    Illustrator OpenType number features are broken.

    I agree that many of the OpenType Panel number features in the latest Illustrator 2017 are broken. No idea when this happened. It affects ordinals, superscript, subscript, and the same formatting when being used to get “Insert Glyph” results (in other words, it can show me a glyph but fails to insert it).

    I am not saying that is an exhaustive list of what isn't working, but I didn't see any issues with the other features I tried.