joeclark

• Activity
• Posts18
• Comments104

• Re: Call for papers: Visible Language, 50th Anniversary Edition

  joeclark

  February 2016
  OK, but it was always a stretch to classify Visible Language as an academic journal after the manner of, say, The Lancet. It does not hold that position now, especially since all its archives are now…
  3

• Re: another day, another sad logo (for the Ontario Conservative party)

  joeclark

  March 2016
  “Experts” (including a guy in the States): * “It suggests a mash-up of each of the three parties, Progressive Conservative, Liberal and Green Party” (even though there are more parties than that in O…
  1

• Re: MetricsMachine crashes groups after redacting the UFO

  joeclark

  February 2016
  Let me know if anyone here does that. Jargon and acronyms can be unintentionally humorous.
  2

• Re: MetricsMachine crashes groups after redacting the UFO

  joeclark

  February 2016
  Best subject line ever.
  0

• Re: Type fiction

  joeclark

  March 2016
  I am truly shocked there is any “type fiction” in existence whatsoever. Though half the responses pertained to nonfiction (Shapes for Sounds is a bust), I am amazed that some on-topic suggestions wer…
  1

Next